Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Frostmarrow" data-source="post: 200868" data-attributes="member: 1122">Marketing sense I agree that this make some people uncomfortable. I'm not really in to marketing but I once bought canned porridge so someone must have persuaded me it was a good idea. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />11 ClassesYes, we couldn't possibly have invented everything already. The possibilities are endless. In any event, let the authors worry about that. Monte Cook for example seem to release a new core class every odd hour. (Huge exaggeration).But you mentioned paladin and ranger being a bit narrow. I agree but there it is. An arcane warrior is the next logical step. However, if there were only four classes; mage, thief, priest and warrior I'd agree even more.FeatsWe are not talking about compiling old stuff. We are talking about adding what ever needs to be added. Some will be new and some we will have seen before. I guess that the Lightning Reflexes feat for example could be reprinted as it's pretty basic. However, we wouldn't have to see a reprint of Cleave for example.SkillsNo new skills. Perhaps new ways to use old skills but I don't want any new skills. I'd like new example DCs though. Such as Pick Pocket - Check if a dude wears a hair-piece - DC 30.SpellsThe book would feature the spells that appear on a spellcasting class' spell list. For example the real PHB has a spell called Holy Sword just because it appears on the paladin spell list not because it's a cool spell. Which it is...[edit format]</blockquote>

Verification