Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Killing Players for stupid reason
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8274569" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Yes, this is a matter we take very seriously, which is why you’re getting such emotionally charged responses. You’re coming across as the bad guy in the situation, even when we only have your side of the story. I hope if nothing else you at least realize that and reconsider your position.</p><p></p><p>Right, so taking your story at face value, those things seem to be in an irreconcilable conflict. Killing the rogue won’t be fun for their player. Letting them get away with it apparently isn’t consistent with the way you see your character. Something has to give, and the question is one of priorities. Either you decide that what’s fun for the group is more important than consistency with the way you imagine your character and don’t kill the rogue, you decide your vision of your character is more important than the rogue’s player’s fun and you do kill the rogue, or you accept that what you want isn’t compatible with what the rest of the group wants and part ways. The advice you’re getting is that the first option is the best, and the third option is obviously not ideal, but it’s better than the second option, which would just be an IRL jerk move.</p><p></p><p>I know you came hoping to find a “loophole” that would let you satisfy your character’s desire for vengeance without hurting the rogue player’s feelings. But that’s just not going to happen. You’re the one who’s decided your character can’t let this go. Accepting that premise, your only options are to change your character (either by changing how you view them such that letting it go is something he “would do” or by deciding to play a different character), to leave the group, or to kill the rogue, and killing the rogue would be the wrong choice. Those are the only resolutions I can see to the situation you’ve described, sorry if you don’t like it.</p><p></p><p>These two statements are logically inconsistent. If the rogue committed such a major, party-breaking betrayal, it’s an IRL issue, because the rogue’s player is not respecting what’s fun for the group. It certainly seems like it has negatively impacted your fun, if nothing else. The appropriate response is to talk to the rogue’s player about it. And I don’t mean ominously suggesting “watch out, my character is really <strong>VENGEFUL</strong>, so you might not want to do that...” I mean telling the rogue’s player straight-up that what they did was not fun for you, as a player, and talk it over like grown-ups.</p><p></p><p>You’re the one who has decided it isn’t a possibility at all. What is or is not reasonable for your character to do is entirely up to you. You can decide to play a character who would let it go, or to play a character who would take revenge. If you decide to play a character who would take revenge, you have, in real life, decided that your vision of the character is more important to you than the rogue player’s enjoyment of the game, and that would make you a jerk.</p><p></p><p>I can accept that premise. Given that you have decided it isn’t a possibility for your character to let it go without killing the rogue, it’s also not a possibility to keep playing this character in this group without ruining someone else’s fun, likely causing more hurt feelings and escalating the real life conflict that the rogue’s player started by betraying your character. These are the consequences of your decisions.</p><p></p><p>I’ve given my best advice given the premise: retire your character and either make a new one that plays nicely with others, or find another group. However, I must reiterate that it is within your power to change the premise: no one is forcing you to play the character this way. You can choose to play the character in such a way that would not demand he kill the rogue. The only person stopping you is you.</p><p></p><p>Good advice.</p><p></p><p>You say that, but it seems like your “talking to the player” consisted of vaguely hinting your character might take revenge. That’s not really addressing the issue, that you’re not happy with what their character did to your character. Furthermore, you specifically <em>avoided</em> telling the other player that you are considering killing their character, for fear that you would give them a meta-game advantage. Instead of making this an in-character vendetta and <em>hiding your intentions</em>, what you should do is talk openly and honestly about your feelings. Tell them you didn’t like having your character humiliated like that, and be honest about the fact that it made you want to kill their character.</p><p></p><p>Good, I’m glad you were at least able to find a solution that didn’t result in escalating any real-life conflict and allowed you to continue playing with your group.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8274569, member: 6779196"] Yes, this is a matter we take very seriously, which is why you’re getting such emotionally charged responses. You’re coming across as the bad guy in the situation, even when we only have your side of the story. I hope if nothing else you at least realize that and reconsider your position. Right, so taking your story at face value, those things seem to be in an irreconcilable conflict. Killing the rogue won’t be fun for their player. Letting them get away with it apparently isn’t consistent with the way you see your character. Something has to give, and the question is one of priorities. Either you decide that what’s fun for the group is more important than consistency with the way you imagine your character and don’t kill the rogue, you decide your vision of your character is more important than the rogue’s player’s fun and you do kill the rogue, or you accept that what you want isn’t compatible with what the rest of the group wants and part ways. The advice you’re getting is that the first option is the best, and the third option is obviously not ideal, but it’s better than the second option, which would just be an IRL jerk move. I know you came hoping to find a “loophole” that would let you satisfy your character’s desire for vengeance without hurting the rogue player’s feelings. But that’s just not going to happen. You’re the one who’s decided your character can’t let this go. Accepting that premise, your only options are to change your character (either by changing how you view them such that letting it go is something he “would do” or by deciding to play a different character), to leave the group, or to kill the rogue, and killing the rogue would be the wrong choice. Those are the only resolutions I can see to the situation you’ve described, sorry if you don’t like it. These two statements are logically inconsistent. If the rogue committed such a major, party-breaking betrayal, it’s an IRL issue, because the rogue’s player is not respecting what’s fun for the group. It certainly seems like it has negatively impacted your fun, if nothing else. The appropriate response is to talk to the rogue’s player about it. And I don’t mean ominously suggesting “watch out, my character is really [B]VENGEFUL[/B], so you might not want to do that...” I mean telling the rogue’s player straight-up that what they did was not fun for you, as a player, and talk it over like grown-ups. You’re the one who has decided it isn’t a possibility at all. What is or is not reasonable for your character to do is entirely up to you. You can decide to play a character who would let it go, or to play a character who would take revenge. If you decide to play a character who would take revenge, you have, in real life, decided that your vision of the character is more important to you than the rogue player’s enjoyment of the game, and that would make you a jerk. I can accept that premise. Given that you have decided it isn’t a possibility for your character to let it go without killing the rogue, it’s also not a possibility to keep playing this character in this group without ruining someone else’s fun, likely causing more hurt feelings and escalating the real life conflict that the rogue’s player started by betraying your character. These are the consequences of your decisions. I’ve given my best advice given the premise: retire your character and either make a new one that plays nicely with others, or find another group. However, I must reiterate that it is within your power to change the premise: no one is forcing you to play the character this way. You can choose to play the character in such a way that would not demand he kill the rogue. The only person stopping you is you. Good advice. You say that, but it seems like your “talking to the player” consisted of vaguely hinting your character might take revenge. That’s not really addressing the issue, that you’re not happy with what their character did to your character. Furthermore, you specifically [I]avoided[/I] telling the other player that you are considering killing their character, for fear that you would give them a meta-game advantage. Instead of making this an in-character vendetta and [I]hiding your intentions[/I], what you should do is talk openly and honestly about your feelings. Tell them you didn’t like having your character humiliated like that, and be honest about the fact that it made you want to kill their character. Good, I’m glad you were at least able to find a solution that didn’t result in escalating any real-life conflict and allowed you to continue playing with your group. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Killing Players for stupid reason
Top