Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Quasqueton" data-source="post: 2149902" data-attributes="member: 3854">I don't disagree. The existance of unusual situations does not invalidate the general assumption and discussion of typical scenarios.For the record, does everyone understand that I pulled the dragon scenario out of my ear, just to give a very simple and quick example?I, personally, in my real campaign planning, don't think "Dragon. But I'll need to add in low level stuff for my low level PCs." I come up with packages, as I described earlier in this thread. I don't think, "15th-level cleric. But I'll need to add in low-level clerics to challenge the low-level PCs." I think, "Murder cult, with a full compliment of priests."I don't think, "15th-level rogue. But I'll need to add in low-level rogues to challenge the low-level PCs." I think, "Spy network, with a full compliment of spies."If I make these packages for an area of my world, I make them to fit the area, not the PCs. They will exist the same if the PCs enter the area at 1st level or at 15th level.The challenge level of individuals or groups in the packages will probably vary from low-level to high-level. The PCs will figure who, when, and how to take on what level of challenge they feel they can overcome.I agree. And your definition of status quo is what I've been saying.Quasqueton</blockquote>