Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JoeGKushner" data-source="post: 1476617" data-attributes="member: 1129">Sure. The setting is Fading Suns. One guy is playing an alien with four arms. This guy is a melee specialist. Such a melee specliast that he doesn't carry any firearms. The other guy is a Battle Brother, very much in RPGing a human supremist from say Warhammer 40K.The Battle Brother goes to sell some forbidden tech we have. The GM decides that tips off the Inquisition who come out with an order from the whole group's arrest. Some run, some fight, some do nothing.The Battle Brother fights his way out, cursing the other players for cowards and fools. The guy with the four arms decides that he doesn't like the way he's being talked down to.At that point, the four armed guy who in a science fiction game decided to call for a vote online, when he knows that the other player doesn't have a computer. I foudn this extremely bold as he's the newer player and people have had issues with him and his characters before. For instance, why would you not carry any type of ranged weapon? If you're a melee specialist, carry an archaic weapon or something to showcase how bad you are.Now these two have had little issues before but it's always both of them that's the problem. In my FR campaign, dude with Four Arms was playing a Priest. He would only heal certain people and mock the other player's character, a powerful barbarian. The barbarian decided to hell with that player and just bought lots of potions. Eventually the other players convinced the guy with the priest to retire him and play something else as he didn't want to be the 'healer' and thought he was the party leader.It goes on and on. I have no problem with a player going, "Yeah, this isn't working out." but to try and tell everyone else that they have to 'vote'? Who made him god? Especially since he isn't DMing or housing the game?</blockquote>

Verification