Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9064628" data-attributes="member: 6801228">You were the one confused and demanding answers, I didn't need any help. I knew exactly what I wrote and why I wrote it that way.No use of the word "ward" either, so you are making things up as much as I am, by your own definition. It just "has resistance". How does it have that resistance? It doesn't say. And sure, right now it says abjuration school, but if you are making it multiple schools why can't it be abjuration evocation or abjuration transmutation to tell how it is doing these things? Heck, Absorb Elements is also Abjuration and it's resistance it directly called out as capturing the elemental energy, so there is even precedence. Unless you want to say that capturing, storing, and unleashing elemental energy is also purely abjuration with no other school.I mean, you do realize you are trying to argue that RAW supports your homebrew idea? Multiple schools isn't RAW. So if you only want to discuss RAW, then enchantment isn't the only school that can deal mind damage, breaking the idea that Enchantment is the mind damage school. So which is it? Are we discussing homebrewing to allow multiple schools? Or are we discussing strict RAW where deciding that a spell that deals with elemental power being of the elemental school is equivalent to swords creating nuclear explosions when swung?But we were discussing your homebrew, so why does it matter what WoTC would do? Can you only homebrew if that homebrew is created by Jeremy Crawford and stamped with "Official 5e Rules"?</blockquote>

Verification