Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9065997" data-attributes="member: 23751">So it was a deliberate Strawman?&nbsp; Because I didn't even come close to saying that and as phrased you were attributing that to me.Asking that question is not a hypothetical.&nbsp; A hypothetical response would have been, &quot;What if WotC decided not to do what you are suggesting and went with multiple schools for every spell?&quot;More Strawmen!!&nbsp; Never said or implied that. What I said was that the multiple schools for spells with........................multiple schools worked just fine and caused no confusion. But hey, falsely attribute what I'm saying to &quot;everything&quot; just like you falsely attributed &quot;all spells&quot; to me. And further falsely attribute it as some sort of One True Way that I never said or implied. And for a THIRD false attributation in a single sentence(a record for you I think, which is impressive), falsely attribute everything in the past as never having any problems to me.And you accuse me of trying to &quot;desperately trying to score points.&quot; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:"&nbsp; data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />Correct.&nbsp; None of those false attributations are anything I actually support.&nbsp; I do however support multiple schools for the few spells that warrant it, as I told you upthread.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9065997, member: 23751"] So it was a deliberate Strawman? Because I didn't even come close to saying that and as phrased you were attributing that to me. Asking that question is not a hypothetical. A hypothetical response would have been, "What if WotC decided not to do what you are suggesting and went with multiple schools for every spell?" More Strawmen!! Never said or implied that. What I said was that the multiple schools for spells with........................multiple schools worked just fine and caused no confusion. But hey, falsely attribute what I'm saying to "everything" just like you falsely attributed "all spells" to me. And further falsely attribute it as some sort of One True Way that I never said or implied. And for a THIRD false attributation in a single sentence(a record for you I think, which is impressive), falsely attribute everything in the past as never having any problems to me. And you accuse me of trying to "desperately trying to score points." :rolleyes: Correct. None of those false attributations are anything I actually support. I do however support multiple schools for the few spells that warrant it, as I told you upthread. [/QUOTE]

Verification