Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9209962" data-attributes="member: 6801228">I'm not the one who brought up the Harry Potter movie.  I am also not the one who declared it was a bad example because it was not a DnD movie. You have only started declaring that movies don't count AFTER a DnD movie that counters your position was put forth.  If the movie agreed with you,  you would use it as evidence.Then why did you make the distinction? A distinction you want to get rid of now that it doesn't support you.  So your defense of your position is that it was nonsense disguised as a point? You seem to keep changing what you meant to say everytime your position becomes untenable.Rules are not rules is your new position? Well, I will counter that rules are rules.Except she doesn't have that ability. We discussed that already.So there is no RAW for Artificers? No RAW for any sorcerer except the wild magic or Draconic? No RAW for magic items. No RAW for feats. No RAW for multi-classing. You do realize that if I corrected someone who said "we are only playing RAW" by removing 80% of the player options,  they would look at me like I'm insane.  "Rules as Written" does not mean "only the rules in the PHB, which are not explicitly called out as variants."It means the rules... as they are written, without adding or changing them.</blockquote>