Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 8980017" data-attributes="member: 59816">I've never had a problem with the Paladin, but I've also never had a Paladin use more than one smite IN THE SAME ROUND, which is what you seem to think it so horrible that they've nerfed. Even with 2-4 encounters per day, most Paladins will &quot;save it for later&quot;.I also really don't understand why the game would need a complete overhaul to facilitate 2-4 encounters per day when &quot;everyone&quot; already plays that way. The game clearly works as is with it. Yes, I agree that there's a few parts that clash, but there's also a few parts that clash with 6-8. For one, that everyone would be bored with the inevitable cakewalk and would probably have blown their resources (needlessly) by the time they got to 8, they'd be unhappily spamming at-wills. OR if they got really, really good at expecting 8, they'd be so careful with resource management that they'd never use anything &quot;in case they need it for later&quot;.Again: Tell me why they can't tweak the parts that clash with the foolish assumption.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FitzTheRuke, post: 8980017, member: 59816"] I've never had a problem with the Paladin, but I've also never had a Paladin use more than one smite IN THE SAME ROUND, which is what you seem to think it so horrible that they've nerfed. Even with 2-4 encounters per day, most Paladins will "save it for later". I also really don't understand why the game would need a complete overhaul to facilitate 2-4 encounters per day when [I]"everyone" already plays that way[/I]. The game clearly works as is with it. Yes, I agree that there's a few parts that clash, but there's also a few parts that clash with 6-8. For one, that everyone would be bored with the inevitable cakewalk and would probably have blown their resources (needlessly) by the time they got to 8, they'd be unhappily spamming at-wills. OR if they got really, really good at expecting 8, they'd be so careful with resource management that they'd never use anything "in case they need it for later". Again: Tell me why they can't tweak the parts that clash with the foolish assumption. [/QUOTE]

Verification