Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jharet" data-source="post: 7863654" data-attributes="member: 83630">A lot of us have followed the development since it was announced and easily identified the areas of change that make play unappealing.&nbsp; Then we look at bookshelves full of 3.5 and Pathfinder books and then ask why were supposed to invest in this all over again before we shrug and go back to our Pathfinder &quot;First Edition&quot; games as they are now called. This second edition was designed for Paizo organized play members...as well as to sell books.&nbsp; It has no appeal to the people that were playing Pathfinder with it's many iterations from occult to mythic rules and doing just fine.It's a game for Pathfinder Society.&nbsp; It was built according to what they like and what those players did not like. I don't need a playtest because I already have superior versions of these classes in the Advanced Players Guide and Advanced Class Guide respectively.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jharet, post: 7863654, member: 83630"] A lot of us have followed the development since it was announced and easily identified the areas of change that make play unappealing. Then we look at bookshelves full of 3.5 and Pathfinder books and then ask why were supposed to invest in this all over again before we shrug and go back to our Pathfinder "First Edition" games as they are now called. This second edition was designed for Paizo organized play members...as well as to sell books. It has no appeal to the people that were playing Pathfinder with it's many iterations from occult to mythic rules and doing just fine. It's a game for Pathfinder Society. It was built according to what they like and what those players did not like. I don't need a playtest because I already have superior versions of these classes in the Advanced Players Guide and Advanced Class Guide respectively. [/QUOTE]

Verification