Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Playtest Packet 6: Monk reactions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9060460" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>The fact that you are talking about the intended fantasy being at odds with the reality of their features? That thing? That's the thing we've been talking about as a bad thing. If the reality at the table is the make is better off not entering into melee with a melee combatant, then the reality for the designers is they messed up.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fundamentally, any warrior class should be able to chase down the mooks and dismantle them. Monks don't blow the other classes out of the water with their damage. They have better mobility than some, sure, but a Barbarian can easily reach 45 to ft of movement too. </p><p></p><p>The bad part of the design is that the Barbarian or the Fighter or the Paladin just needs a movement solution, something many of them have. They can switch between running down the mooks or focusing on the big guy. The Monk CAN'T. Fundamentally, they lack the ability to consistently fight in melee with the big guy. Yes, you can decide to play an archer instead of a monk, but there are better chassises to use to build an archer than a monk base class. </p><p></p><p>And frankly, I think the answer is just a little bit of a change. Just a few small things will fix the monk, and it won't even ruin this idea of them being the kite instead of the wall. </p><p></p><p>level 1: </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Give them a d10 HD</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Give them + 5 ft of movement.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Give them Fancy Footwork</li> </ul><p></p><p>Level 2: </p><p>- Change the ki to be lv+wisdom mod</p><p></p><p></p><p>And that really solves their low-level problems. They are still mobile, kiting, warriors who don't stay in melee, but now they don't need to spend ki every turn to retreat after getting in melee. If they are in melee, the d10 HD gives them just a bit more survivability. It doesn't seem like a lot, but since your typical monk is going to have a +1 con that raises them from 9 hp to 11 hp. Two hp isn't much, but it means they can survive being hit twice by a goblin, where before they couldn't. </p><p></p><p>And then you increase the Ki, so they can use their abilities a little more often. With the Fancy Footwork ability (which most monks spend their level 4 feat to get because it is so vital) they don't need ki to disengage, unless they are dealing with a large number of foes, and they can flurry, disengage, and move. </p><p></p><p>They still need a damage boost at level 11, but I'm serious, I think those small changes at levels 1 and 2 flip the switch and make all the difference in allowing the monk to stay mobile and not get bogged down in combat, use their abilities more often, and feel better able to survive on the frontline if it becomes necessary for them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9060460, member: 6801228"] The fact that you are talking about the intended fantasy being at odds with the reality of their features? That thing? That's the thing we've been talking about as a bad thing. If the reality at the table is the make is better off not entering into melee with a melee combatant, then the reality for the designers is they messed up. Fundamentally, any warrior class should be able to chase down the mooks and dismantle them. Monks don't blow the other classes out of the water with their damage. They have better mobility than some, sure, but a Barbarian can easily reach 45 to ft of movement too. The bad part of the design is that the Barbarian or the Fighter or the Paladin just needs a movement solution, something many of them have. They can switch between running down the mooks or focusing on the big guy. The Monk CAN'T. Fundamentally, they lack the ability to consistently fight in melee with the big guy. Yes, you can decide to play an archer instead of a monk, but there are better chassises to use to build an archer than a monk base class. And frankly, I think the answer is just a little bit of a change. Just a few small things will fix the monk, and it won't even ruin this idea of them being the kite instead of the wall. level 1: [LIST] [*]Give them a d10 HD [*]Give them + 5 ft of movement. [*]Give them Fancy Footwork [/LIST] Level 2: - Change the ki to be lv+wisdom mod And that really solves their low-level problems. They are still mobile, kiting, warriors who don't stay in melee, but now they don't need to spend ki every turn to retreat after getting in melee. If they are in melee, the d10 HD gives them just a bit more survivability. It doesn't seem like a lot, but since your typical monk is going to have a +1 con that raises them from 9 hp to 11 hp. Two hp isn't much, but it means they can survive being hit twice by a goblin, where before they couldn't. And then you increase the Ki, so they can use their abilities a little more often. With the Fancy Footwork ability (which most monks spend their level 4 feat to get because it is so vital) they don't need ki to disengage, unless they are dealing with a large number of foes, and they can flurry, disengage, and move. They still need a damage boost at level 11, but I'm serious, I think those small changes at levels 1 and 2 flip the switch and make all the difference in allowing the monk to stay mobile and not get bogged down in combat, use their abilities more often, and feel better able to survive on the frontline if it becomes necessary for them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Playtest Packet 6: Monk reactions?
Top