Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Playtest report - can 22 goblins defeat alcohol?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KesselZero" data-source="post: 5932533" data-attributes="member: 6689976"><p>I would agree that the Guardian theme's shield ability isn't meant to be used to protect the guy who has the ability. I can see both sides about the RAW but I would rule based on assumed intent there.</p><p></p><p>As for intoxication, I didn't notice it before but I do think it's an issue for the wizard. Maybe the rule becomes something like "You have disadvantage on attack rolls, and creatures have advantage to saving throws against effects you cause."</p><p></p><p>Regarding the reaction rules, obviously they need to be clarified. I also spent some time working out these rules because of the L&L article that suggested using a reaction would spend your next turn's action. Where I came down is that there are only two reactions mentioned in the playtest (someone correct me if I'm wrong): the Guardian's ability, and readying an action. The Guardian ability wouldn't use your next turn's action, since it doesn't say anywhere in the rules that it should, and it's situational enough (you have to be within five feet of an ally who's getting hit) that it won't come up constantly and thus be spammed and broken. It never got used in my playtest, frex. This would actually also be an argument against it being usable on the Guardian himself: in that case he could use it every single turn almost guaranteed, making it very powerful.</p><p></p><p>Readying an action, on the other hand, wouldn't use your next turn's action, but rather your current turn's action. That is, it would work like it has in 3e and 4e-- instead of taking an action this turn, you "save" it for later in the round, then when it goes off your place in the initiative order drops to that spot. I believe this is even addressed in the playtest packet. So readying an action lets you take a reaction if the definition of reaction is "doing something on someone else's turn," but it's really just a readied action as we know and love them. I expect we'll see more powers that grant reactions in the future, some that use up next turn's action (Opportunity Attacks, perhaps) and some that don't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KesselZero, post: 5932533, member: 6689976"] I would agree that the Guardian theme's shield ability isn't meant to be used to protect the guy who has the ability. I can see both sides about the RAW but I would rule based on assumed intent there. As for intoxication, I didn't notice it before but I do think it's an issue for the wizard. Maybe the rule becomes something like "You have disadvantage on attack rolls, and creatures have advantage to saving throws against effects you cause." Regarding the reaction rules, obviously they need to be clarified. I also spent some time working out these rules because of the L&L article that suggested using a reaction would spend your next turn's action. Where I came down is that there are only two reactions mentioned in the playtest (someone correct me if I'm wrong): the Guardian's ability, and readying an action. The Guardian ability wouldn't use your next turn's action, since it doesn't say anywhere in the rules that it should, and it's situational enough (you have to be within five feet of an ally who's getting hit) that it won't come up constantly and thus be spammed and broken. It never got used in my playtest, frex. This would actually also be an argument against it being usable on the Guardian himself: in that case he could use it every single turn almost guaranteed, making it very powerful. Readying an action, on the other hand, wouldn't use your next turn's action, but rather your current turn's action. That is, it would work like it has in 3e and 4e-- instead of taking an action this turn, you "save" it for later in the round, then when it goes off your place in the initiative order drops to that spot. I believe this is even addressed in the playtest packet. So readying an action lets you take a reaction if the definition of reaction is "doing something on someone else's turn," but it's really just a readied action as we know and love them. I expect we'll see more powers that grant reactions in the future, some that use up next turn's action (Opportunity Attacks, perhaps) and some that don't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Playtest report - can 22 goblins defeat alcohol?
Top