Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 4129346" data-attributes="member: 1465">I know. That's why I said that our testing was limited. However, it was not really PvP. I don't know how you define PvP, but anyway: I was running 3 characters at once, against the PCs, so that' not different from what can happen during a game, when the PCs meet 3 NPCs (except that perhaps according to the rules the NPC might be different?).10 rounds x 6 character is 60 turns. If we have took 2 minutes per turn, it's already 2 hours. But as I said, we definitely wasted some time choosing which powers to use (3 actions per round, plus checking reactions is not little) and trying to understand how they work.Yeah, I just mean that probably because we're not used to the new diagonal measurements, we were often caught by surprise, expecting that something was far away enough and instead it wasn't.I understand that strikers are purposefully designed as damage dealers. However, it felt pretty unfair. Careful Attack (that's actually the right name, which I had forgot!) was a real killer at 1st level with an attack bonus of +10 and with a damage of 1d10+1d8+4. The problem is that it's like that all the time, because it's an at-will.We'll try to play again one of these evenings, and see if maybe it was just lucky with the dice.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 4129346, member: 1465"] I know. That's why I said that our testing was limited. However, it was not really PvP. I don't know how you define PvP, but anyway: I was running 3 characters at once, against the PCs, so that' not different from what can happen during a game, when the PCs meet 3 NPCs (except that perhaps according to the rules the NPC might be different?). 10 rounds x 6 character is 60 turns. If we have took 2 minutes per turn, it's already 2 hours. But as I said, we definitely wasted some time choosing which powers to use (3 actions per round, plus checking reactions is not little) and trying to understand how they work. Yeah, I just mean that probably because we're not used to the new diagonal measurements, we were often caught by surprise, expecting that something was far away enough and instead it wasn't. I understand that strikers are purposefully designed as damage dealers. However, it felt pretty unfair. Careful Attack (that's actually the right name, which I had forgot!) was a real killer at 1st level with an attack bonus of +10 and with a damage of 1d10+1d8+4. The problem is that it's like that all the time, because it's an at-will. We'll try to play again one of these evenings, and see if maybe it was just lucky with the dice. [/QUOTE]

Verification