Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Playtesting vs a .5 Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ObsidianCrane" data-source="post: 3956113" data-attributes="member: 54918"><p>People are saying (including WotC folks) SWSE and TBo9S are previews for 4E. People in this thread pointed to those products being play tested as evidence for play testing of 4E. These are essentially false claims as far as can be determined by public knowledge.</p><p></p><p>First consider how many of you have played a SWSE game with TBo9S?</p><p>How many with the clearly altered racial rules? (See the Elf preview)</p><p>How many have played SWSE with ToB9S and wizards with at will and per encounter abilities in addition to spells (which are often per day at low level now)?</p><p>How many people have used Resurrection as a Ritual?</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry neither SWSE or 3.5+Splatbooks is in no way a true play test for 4E, and to lead people to believe so is to mislead them. (When taken literally - which I haven't been, but it has been used so in this thread.)</p><p></p><p>To say that SWSE and the 3.5 splatbooks were used to test many ideas that 4E is based on is a different thing, and clearly (based on public knowledge) not misleading (and how I have interpreted the WotC Staff's statements on the matter).</p><p></p><p>Any significant change to a rule set requires significant play testing. That doesn't mean 4E needs a public play test, and without knowing what the numbers are of play testers its impossible to adequately critique the process WotC is following.</p><p></p><p>Yes I want to be on the PT team, because drat it I am well and truely done with 3.X, and 4E based on the ideas and concepts evident in SWSE, and many splat books such as TBo9S looks a lot more exciting to play. </p><p></p><p>Yes I also recognise that no amount of play testing is ever like exposure to the public at large. 500 people will always find more problems than 50 people. But effective play testing is more likely done with 50 than 500 initially because of signal to noise ratio.</p><p></p><p>Basically public play test is a disaster for WotC, and there is no legitimate way, without WotC knowledge, to claim more play testing is required.</p><p></p><p>But to claim the change from 3.XE to 4E is not significant, I think is also misleading in the grand scheme of things. Elves certainly changed as much between 3.5E and 4E as they did between 2E and 3E (based on public information).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ObsidianCrane, post: 3956113, member: 54918"] People are saying (including WotC folks) SWSE and TBo9S are previews for 4E. People in this thread pointed to those products being play tested as evidence for play testing of 4E. These are essentially false claims as far as can be determined by public knowledge. First consider how many of you have played a SWSE game with TBo9S? How many with the clearly altered racial rules? (See the Elf preview) How many have played SWSE with ToB9S and wizards with at will and per encounter abilities in addition to spells (which are often per day at low level now)? How many people have used Resurrection as a Ritual? I'm sorry neither SWSE or 3.5+Splatbooks is in no way a true play test for 4E, and to lead people to believe so is to mislead them. (When taken literally - which I haven't been, but it has been used so in this thread.) To say that SWSE and the 3.5 splatbooks were used to test many ideas that 4E is based on is a different thing, and clearly (based on public knowledge) not misleading (and how I have interpreted the WotC Staff's statements on the matter). Any significant change to a rule set requires significant play testing. That doesn't mean 4E needs a public play test, and without knowing what the numbers are of play testers its impossible to adequately critique the process WotC is following. Yes I want to be on the PT team, because drat it I am well and truely done with 3.X, and 4E based on the ideas and concepts evident in SWSE, and many splat books such as TBo9S looks a lot more exciting to play. Yes I also recognise that no amount of play testing is ever like exposure to the public at large. 500 people will always find more problems than 50 people. But effective play testing is more likely done with 50 than 500 initially because of signal to noise ratio. Basically public play test is a disaster for WotC, and there is no legitimate way, without WotC knowledge, to claim more play testing is required. But to claim the change from 3.XE to 4E is not significant, I think is also misleading in the grand scheme of things. Elves certainly changed as much between 3.5E and 4E as they did between 2E and 3E (based on public information). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Playtesting vs a .5 Edition
Top