Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Please Cap the Ability Scores in 5E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 5849161" data-attributes="member: 92511"><p>I voted "fairly low".</p><p></p><p>However, aas others have stated or hinted at, a short section of suggestions in the DMG would probably work best.</p><p></p><p>"For traditional/Classic/Adventurer game play cap scores (without magical assistance) at 18."</p><p></p><p>"For expanded/Legacy/Expert game play cap scores (with or without magical assistance) at 25."</p><p></p><p>"For epic/Legendary/Master game play (with or without magical assistance) there should be no cap."</p><p></p><p>But then, this runs into a problem with the stated desire that players using different modules/optional systems should/could sit down and play at the same table. If my "Conan-esque" fighter is maxed out with 18 Strength (without magic) and I'm playing with a "Legacy" or "Legends" PC with a 22 or 45 strength, how are we supposed to play the same game?</p><p></p><p>I, also, will throw in my two coppers that I have no problem with Racial maximums being different. The flavor/fluff that a dwarf can survive harsher treatment (higher than 18 Con) than the toughest human or an elf could be more dextrous or intelligent or wise than the smartest or wisest human does not bother me at all.</p><p></p><p>I am also not opposed to goign back to the B/X, BECMI idea of Racial minimums...that your "average" adventuring elf is automatically, somewhat more dextrous and/or intelligent than your "average" adventuring human. You must have minimums to play X race was another good way of incorporating flavor.</p><p></p><p>The problem there, as we've seen all over the "race" threads, is that not everyone likes or necessarily wants the races to have the same/"built-in" fluff/flavor.</p><p></p><p>The bonus modifications, in general, I would make sigNIFicantly more rare, less accessible. MAYBE a [1] single Racial Feat/Skill/Theme that allows +1 to X. MAYBE a Racial Mod but not more than +1 to X (and NO, humans don't get this. I'm a little tired of the argument, these others races get this so humans need it too for "balance". Humans are the Baseline. Bonuses/penalties work off of what humans are capable of. Say, well if an elf get +1 Dex. and a dwarf +1 Con, then a human gets a +1 they can put anywhere they want just doesn't make sense, imho.). MAYBE a magic item or two that will effect/amp up X or Y ability, without which the hero goes back to whatever they started with. </p><p></p><p>Maybe ability mod's should be built-in to class? A Fighter automatically gets +1 to their Str., Mages +1 to Int, etc...and/or ANY class may add +1 to their Con or Cha (for those extra "tough" or "charmign" folks) if they desire. Something like that for Humans...?</p><p></p><p>But PCs shouldn't be able to, from the start of play (unless you're playing epic/superhero/Legends type of game) with +4, +10, +62 to any of their abilities, no matter how many feats/skills/items/what race they are/have.</p><p></p><p>So...yeah, if I had a starting party of 1st level guys with a human fighter with 16 Str.(straight roll or placement or however you determine your ability scores), a dwarf Fighter with 19 Con. (roll of 18 with +1 for being a dwarf), a human Cleric with 17 Wis. (because she rolled 16 and took the "Contemplative" theme to give them +1) and an elf Mage with 19 Int. (rolled 17, +1 for being an elf and +1 for the "Bookworm/Researcher" theme)...not a magic item in sight, I would think this is a solid/normal party.</p><p></p><p>When they get a couple of (very rare) magic items and the Fighter now has Ogre Strength (what is that, 20?) and the Cleric has up'ed their Wisdom to 19 with a Pearl of Wisdom and reading some Tome, that makes total sense.</p><p></p><p>But they still will appear to pale in comparison of the other group with the human barbarian of 25 Strength and 28 Con, a 30 Dex halfling thief and a sinister tiefling warlock whose pact afforded them a 40 Int.</p><p></p><p>Rambling...I know. Working off of coffee #1. But I guess my point...is...what is my point? <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p><p></p><p>Options good. Endless mods bad. Caps...erhm...wherever you like 'em for your game. Yeah, I guess that covers it.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>--SD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 5849161, member: 92511"] I voted "fairly low". However, aas others have stated or hinted at, a short section of suggestions in the DMG would probably work best. "For traditional/Classic/Adventurer game play cap scores (without magical assistance) at 18." "For expanded/Legacy/Expert game play cap scores (with or without magical assistance) at 25." "For epic/Legendary/Master game play (with or without magical assistance) there should be no cap." But then, this runs into a problem with the stated desire that players using different modules/optional systems should/could sit down and play at the same table. If my "Conan-esque" fighter is maxed out with 18 Strength (without magic) and I'm playing with a "Legacy" or "Legends" PC with a 22 or 45 strength, how are we supposed to play the same game? I, also, will throw in my two coppers that I have no problem with Racial maximums being different. The flavor/fluff that a dwarf can survive harsher treatment (higher than 18 Con) than the toughest human or an elf could be more dextrous or intelligent or wise than the smartest or wisest human does not bother me at all. I am also not opposed to goign back to the B/X, BECMI idea of Racial minimums...that your "average" adventuring elf is automatically, somewhat more dextrous and/or intelligent than your "average" adventuring human. You must have minimums to play X race was another good way of incorporating flavor. The problem there, as we've seen all over the "race" threads, is that not everyone likes or necessarily wants the races to have the same/"built-in" fluff/flavor. The bonus modifications, in general, I would make sigNIFicantly more rare, less accessible. MAYBE a [1] single Racial Feat/Skill/Theme that allows +1 to X. MAYBE a Racial Mod but not more than +1 to X (and NO, humans don't get this. I'm a little tired of the argument, these others races get this so humans need it too for "balance". Humans are the Baseline. Bonuses/penalties work off of what humans are capable of. Say, well if an elf get +1 Dex. and a dwarf +1 Con, then a human gets a +1 they can put anywhere they want just doesn't make sense, imho.). MAYBE a magic item or two that will effect/amp up X or Y ability, without which the hero goes back to whatever they started with. Maybe ability mod's should be built-in to class? A Fighter automatically gets +1 to their Str., Mages +1 to Int, etc...and/or ANY class may add +1 to their Con or Cha (for those extra "tough" or "charmign" folks) if they desire. Something like that for Humans...? But PCs shouldn't be able to, from the start of play (unless you're playing epic/superhero/Legends type of game) with +4, +10, +62 to any of their abilities, no matter how many feats/skills/items/what race they are/have. So...yeah, if I had a starting party of 1st level guys with a human fighter with 16 Str.(straight roll or placement or however you determine your ability scores), a dwarf Fighter with 19 Con. (roll of 18 with +1 for being a dwarf), a human Cleric with 17 Wis. (because she rolled 16 and took the "Contemplative" theme to give them +1) and an elf Mage with 19 Int. (rolled 17, +1 for being an elf and +1 for the "Bookworm/Researcher" theme)...not a magic item in sight, I would think this is a solid/normal party. When they get a couple of (very rare) magic items and the Fighter now has Ogre Strength (what is that, 20?) and the Cleric has up'ed their Wisdom to 19 with a Pearl of Wisdom and reading some Tome, that makes total sense. But they still will appear to pale in comparison of the other group with the human barbarian of 25 Strength and 28 Con, a 30 Dex halfling thief and a sinister tiefling warlock whose pact afforded them a 40 Int. Rambling...I know. Working off of coffee #1. But I guess my point...is...what is my point? :erm: Options good. Endless mods bad. Caps...erhm...wherever you like 'em for your game. Yeah, I guess that covers it.:p --SD [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Please Cap the Ability Scores in 5E
Top