Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Please correct my understanding of a feudal army
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 3551806" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>To the above I would add three critical points in the feudal contract:</p><p></p><p>1 - the Lord was obligated to protect his vassal's lands when called upon by the vassal with a just complaint. Like many things, it was honoured as much in the breach as in the observance, but a failure to protect your vassals was the surest way to ensure that when called upon, your <em>other</em> vassals would have pressing business elsewhere or claimed to have never to have "received" your summons;</p><p></p><p>2 - the service owed to the Lord was for a set period of time. It was not an open-ended contract of service. This meant long campaigns were hard to manage without incentives (plunder, more lands, titles, marriage offers and other heriditaments - (which is why the Hundred Years War became very much concerned about these things); and,</p><p></p><p>3- the Lord was obligated to feed the men contributed by the vassal when they were called upon for service. This was not a small point; in fact, it was the trickiest point of all. Honouring <em>that </em>more in the breach than in the observance means your men ended up spoiling your own lands or just plain going home.</p><p></p><p>Given the limited nature of medieval agriculture, lack of preservatives for food and poor transport, the simple presence of an army moving across the land and spoiling it to feed itself was an economic disaster that could take a decade or more to recover from. It was worse than any plague of locusts.</p><p></p><p>As agriculture improved in Europe as it moved into the modern era, by Fredrick the Great's and later Napoleon's times, the land could support many more soldiers marching through a given portion of it. Napoleon's method of breaking up his armies and marching his troops across the land through several paths to then unite them at their destination was mostly about spreading the load of feeding that army as they moved across a far larger area of land.</p><p></p><p>The problem of logistics and supply are not too terribly heroic. They are, unfortunately, what medieval warfare was very much about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 3551806, member: 20741"] To the above I would add three critical points in the feudal contract: 1 - the Lord was obligated to protect his vassal's lands when called upon by the vassal with a just complaint. Like many things, it was honoured as much in the breach as in the observance, but a failure to protect your vassals was the surest way to ensure that when called upon, your [I]other[/I] vassals would have pressing business elsewhere or claimed to have never to have "received" your summons; 2 - the service owed to the Lord was for a set period of time. It was not an open-ended contract of service. This meant long campaigns were hard to manage without incentives (plunder, more lands, titles, marriage offers and other heriditaments - (which is why the Hundred Years War became very much concerned about these things); and, 3- the Lord was obligated to feed the men contributed by the vassal when they were called upon for service. This was not a small point; in fact, it was the trickiest point of all. Honouring [I]that [/I]more in the breach than in the observance means your men ended up spoiling your own lands or just plain going home. Given the limited nature of medieval agriculture, lack of preservatives for food and poor transport, the simple presence of an army moving across the land and spoiling it to feed itself was an economic disaster that could take a decade or more to recover from. It was worse than any plague of locusts. As agriculture improved in Europe as it moved into the modern era, by Fredrick the Great's and later Napoleon's times, the land could support many more soldiers marching through a given portion of it. Napoleon's method of breaking up his armies and marching his troops across the land through several paths to then unite them at their destination was mostly about spreading the load of feeding that army as they moved across a far larger area of land. The problem of logistics and supply are not too terribly heroic. They are, unfortunately, what medieval warfare was very much about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Please correct my understanding of a feudal army
Top