Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please Critique my House Ruled Crossbows.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 1038413" data-attributes="member: 6939"><p>There were very few 'professional' soldiers then. That was the whole 'militia' thing. It is a fairly recent occurence that wars are fought with only professional soldiers. It used to contain lots of militia and levys and such.</p><p>But it was often required that citizens *had* to own certain weaponry, and practice a certian amount. The Lonbowmen, though not 'professional', required lots of practice. Usually from a fairly young age. </p><p>The French (among others) did not see the advantage to the Longbow. Like the English did not see the advantage of gunnery.</p><p></p><p>The longbow had a longer range, was a much higher pull, and therefore could deliver more arrows, with more effect.</p><p></p><p>As for the 'fall on the enemy'; the advantage was range, not angle of attack. If you throw a ball 10 meters, it is fairly straight; if you throw it 50 meters, you throw it fairly high. This is just pure physics. So sure, they aimed high, but that was to get range. It should 'land' at about the same angle that it was shot. (okay, wind resistence will have an effect, but it shouldn't be too much.)</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Longbows did a number on plate armour also. But neither was all *that* effective at range. (despite some cool famous examples) The difference was that it took a LOT of training to become competent with a Longbow, and a Crossbow got similar range/power results, and any old peasant could use it with little training. The difference was being able to field 50 longbowman, or as many crossbowmen as you had crossbows.</p><p>The crossbow was not a 'better' weapon than the longbow, it was just easier (and slower)</p><p>The Longbow is often referred to as the 'machine gun' of the middle ages, the Crossbow is....not. This is fairly accurately dipicted in the D20 rules I think. </p><p>Honestly, I think the Longbow should be moved to 'exotic', leave the shorbow at martial, and the crossbow at simple.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Sorry, I am going to have to call 'urban legend' on this one. I see NO WAY for a bolt able to penetrate steel is going to be quickly redirected 180 degrees to kill its shooter. It just way does not make sense. Please provide some linkage or something, because this just does NOT happen. A 'bit of wind'??? Think about this for a moment.... And why crossbows and not other bows??</p><p>Sorry, doesn't make any sense.</p><p></p><p>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coredump, post: 1038413, member: 6939"] There were very few 'professional' soldiers then. That was the whole 'militia' thing. It is a fairly recent occurence that wars are fought with only professional soldiers. It used to contain lots of militia and levys and such. But it was often required that citizens *had* to own certain weaponry, and practice a certian amount. The Lonbowmen, though not 'professional', required lots of practice. Usually from a fairly young age. The French (among others) did not see the advantage to the Longbow. Like the English did not see the advantage of gunnery. The longbow had a longer range, was a much higher pull, and therefore could deliver more arrows, with more effect. As for the 'fall on the enemy'; the advantage was range, not angle of attack. If you throw a ball 10 meters, it is fairly straight; if you throw it 50 meters, you throw it fairly high. This is just pure physics. So sure, they aimed high, but that was to get range. It should 'land' at about the same angle that it was shot. (okay, wind resistence will have an effect, but it shouldn't be too much.) Longbows did a number on plate armour also. But neither was all *that* effective at range. (despite some cool famous examples) The difference was that it took a LOT of training to become competent with a Longbow, and a Crossbow got similar range/power results, and any old peasant could use it with little training. The difference was being able to field 50 longbowman, or as many crossbowmen as you had crossbows. The crossbow was not a 'better' weapon than the longbow, it was just easier (and slower) The Longbow is often referred to as the 'machine gun' of the middle ages, the Crossbow is....not. This is fairly accurately dipicted in the D20 rules I think. Honestly, I think the Longbow should be moved to 'exotic', leave the shorbow at martial, and the crossbow at simple. Sorry, I am going to have to call 'urban legend' on this one. I see NO WAY for a bolt able to penetrate steel is going to be quickly redirected 180 degrees to kill its shooter. It just way does not make sense. Please provide some linkage or something, because this just does NOT happen. A 'bit of wind'??? Think about this for a moment.... And why crossbows and not other bows?? Sorry, doesn't make any sense. . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please Critique my House Ruled Crossbows.
Top