Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please critique these tactical powers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alvrod" data-source="post: 4424242" data-attributes="member: 70408"><p>Hello</p><p></p><p>I'm thinking to use these new powers in my game. I'd love to hear your thoughts on whether they are balanced and would work well. The point is to give the players a couple of tactical choices supported by the mechanics. I'm doubting whether to give them for free to everyone or to require a feat to get them and would be specially interested to know your thoughts on that.</p><p></p><p>So, here they are.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p><strong>Jump Back</strong> Utility 1</p><p><em>You yield ground to avoid damage</em></p><p>At Will </p><p>Immediate reaction</p><p>Trigger: You are hit by a melee attack</p><p>Requirement: There is a movement legal square behind you</p><p>Effect: Take half damage. The attacker pushes you 1 square. If the square you move into is difficult terrain, you are prone.</p><p>---</p><p>The point of this power is to simulate you jumping back when being attacked to avoid the attacker. It's at-will but very tactical because often you won't have a legal square behind you. It also gives a mechanic where you get a benefit to "cornering" your opponent or ganging up on him, because then he won't be able to use it.</p><p></p><p>Another option would be to have it work like this:</p><p>Immediate interrupt</p><p>Trigger: You are hit by a melee attack</p><p>Requirement: There is a legal square behind you</p><p>Effect: Get a +2 to relevant defense. The attacker pushes you 1 square. If the square you move into is difficult terrain, you are prone.</p><p></p><p>Which one would you think would work best? Is half damage or +2 to Def the proper modifier?</p><p></p><p>---</p><p><strong>Suppression Fire</strong> Utility 1<em></em></p><p><em>This is <strong>my </strong>square. There are many like it but this one is <strong>mine</strong>.</em></p><p>At Will</p><p>Standard Action Any attack</p><p>Target: One square within range</p><p>Effect: Until the beginning of your next turn, any creature entering your square gives you an Opportunity Attack at +2 to attack, even if the creature entered it by shifting or being forcefully moved.</p><p>---</p><p>So you spend your standard action and threaten one square. It even works with ranged weapons or powers so a wizard could do it with his Magic Missile. This also allows for defensive formation tactics. A line of Fighters in a narrow passage could easily keep a lot of enemies at bay this way, because of their Combat Superiority. And it's very tactical since you only threaten <strong>one </strong>square.</p><p></p><p>I also wonder if the +2 to attack is balanced. It represents your increased chances to hit since you're focusing on attacking anything that enters that square. Maybe it would be more balanced if using it provoked OAs as well?</p><p></p><p>Thanks for any comments <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />. If anyone has links to other similar tactical powers, preferably powers that can be given to all combatants for free.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alvrod, post: 4424242, member: 70408"] Hello I'm thinking to use these new powers in my game. I'd love to hear your thoughts on whether they are balanced and would work well. The point is to give the players a couple of tactical choices supported by the mechanics. I'm doubting whether to give them for free to everyone or to require a feat to get them and would be specially interested to know your thoughts on that. So, here they are. --- [B]Jump Back[/B] Utility 1 [I]You yield ground to avoid damage[/I] At Will Immediate reaction Trigger: You are hit by a melee attack Requirement: There is a movement legal square behind you Effect: Take half damage. The attacker pushes you 1 square. If the square you move into is difficult terrain, you are prone. --- The point of this power is to simulate you jumping back when being attacked to avoid the attacker. It's at-will but very tactical because often you won't have a legal square behind you. It also gives a mechanic where you get a benefit to "cornering" your opponent or ganging up on him, because then he won't be able to use it. Another option would be to have it work like this: Immediate interrupt Trigger: You are hit by a melee attack Requirement: There is a legal square behind you Effect: Get a +2 to relevant defense. The attacker pushes you 1 square. If the square you move into is difficult terrain, you are prone. Which one would you think would work best? Is half damage or +2 to Def the proper modifier? --- [B]Suppression Fire[/B] Utility 1[I] This is [B]my [/B]square. There are many like it but this one is [B]mine[/B].[/I] At Will Standard Action Any attack Target: One square within range Effect: Until the beginning of your next turn, any creature entering your square gives you an Opportunity Attack at +2 to attack, even if the creature entered it by shifting or being forcefully moved. --- So you spend your standard action and threaten one square. It even works with ranged weapons or powers so a wizard could do it with his Magic Missile. This also allows for defensive formation tactics. A line of Fighters in a narrow passage could easily keep a lot of enemies at bay this way, because of their Combat Superiority. And it's very tactical since you only threaten [B]one [/B]square. I also wonder if the +2 to attack is balanced. It represents your increased chances to hit since you're focusing on attacking anything that enters that square. Maybe it would be more balanced if using it provoked OAs as well? Thanks for any comments :). If anyone has links to other similar tactical powers, preferably powers that can be given to all combatants for free. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please critique these tactical powers
Top