Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Please cure my 4e illiteracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4623076" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>For the OP: The flaw in Imaro's reading of Page 42 is that he's using it as an absolute guide instead of a set of guidelines for ad hoc stunts and new skill uses.</p><p> </p><p>Here's what he's referring to:</p><p> </p><p>The table gives example skill DCs in case your PCs come up with a skill use not covered by the rules. These skill DCs don't cover anything in particular: they're just examples. The idea is simple: the PC comes up with an idea not covered by existing skill DCs. The DM decides if this should be "easy, medium, or hard" for the character to accomplish. Then he looks at the character's level, and sets the DC according to what is known to be "easy, medium, or hard" for a character of that level. That's it.</p><p> </p><p>Some people go into a sort of rage over this because they feel that it implies that the DC of a task goes up as the PCs advance in levels. For example, a level 1 PC might want to leap from a building onto the back of a galloping horse, and the DM might call that a hard athletics check, and assign a DC of 25 based on the page 42 chart. That's going to be nearly impossible for a level 1 PC. Many sessions later, a level 11 PC might want to do the same thing, and critics worry that the DM will assign the level 11 "hard" DC to the task, resulting in a DC of 30- a skill DC that rose based on nothing more than the character advancing in level.</p><p> </p><p>The flaw in that reasoning is in not understanding the purpose of an "action the rules don't cover" section. The goal is to provide fast DCs calibrated to the player's level and applied BY THE DM AS HE DEEMS FIT. That's why there isn't any guide for what counts as easy, medium, or hard. ITS JUST A CHART OF DIFFICULTY CHECKS. If your DM decides that a task is "medium" for a level 1 PC, and gives it a skill DC of 20, and then later forgets and redecides that its an "medium" DC for a level 8 PC, that's really his problem, not the chart's.</p><p> </p><p>The chart isn't rules! Its guidelines for how to make ad hoc rulings, and everyone should be judging according to the criteria on what makes good ad hoc rulings. NOT on what makes good permanent rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4623076, member: 40961"] For the OP: The flaw in Imaro's reading of Page 42 is that he's using it as an absolute guide instead of a set of guidelines for ad hoc stunts and new skill uses. Here's what he's referring to: The table gives example skill DCs in case your PCs come up with a skill use not covered by the rules. These skill DCs don't cover anything in particular: they're just examples. The idea is simple: the PC comes up with an idea not covered by existing skill DCs. The DM decides if this should be "easy, medium, or hard" for the character to accomplish. Then he looks at the character's level, and sets the DC according to what is known to be "easy, medium, or hard" for a character of that level. That's it. Some people go into a sort of rage over this because they feel that it implies that the DC of a task goes up as the PCs advance in levels. For example, a level 1 PC might want to leap from a building onto the back of a galloping horse, and the DM might call that a hard athletics check, and assign a DC of 25 based on the page 42 chart. That's going to be nearly impossible for a level 1 PC. Many sessions later, a level 11 PC might want to do the same thing, and critics worry that the DM will assign the level 11 "hard" DC to the task, resulting in a DC of 30- a skill DC that rose based on nothing more than the character advancing in level. The flaw in that reasoning is in not understanding the purpose of an "action the rules don't cover" section. The goal is to provide fast DCs calibrated to the player's level and applied BY THE DM AS HE DEEMS FIT. That's why there isn't any guide for what counts as easy, medium, or hard. ITS JUST A CHART OF DIFFICULTY CHECKS. If your DM decides that a task is "medium" for a level 1 PC, and gives it a skill DC of 20, and then later forgets and redecides that its an "medium" DC for a level 8 PC, that's really his problem, not the chart's. The chart isn't rules! Its guidelines for how to make ad hoc rulings, and everyone should be judging according to the criteria on what makes good ad hoc rulings. NOT on what makes good permanent rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Please cure my 4e illiteracy
Top