Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Chink in the Armor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 919867" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Gaiden: Yes, leaving aside some rules issues that is basically true. But, even so you are still talking about a very limited special circumstance feat.</p><p></p><p>Most springy types I've encountered are rogues, or at least multi-classed rogue/fighter/duelists/shadow dancers in some combination. </p><p></p><p>It is certainly not clear to me that attacking every other round (or half the time you are able) is worth a small bonus to hit. In most cases, I suspect that if you worked out the numbers the iterative attack sequence would do more damage than something with a small bonus to hit. Remember, a 20 always hits. Imagine the situation of a 3 attack character who needs a 10 on his first attack vs. something with 12 armor bonus. You are trading a single attack at a 80% chance of hitting, for one attack at 50%, one at 25%, and one at 5%. That's about a wash. Looking over the course of the whole cycle, you are basically trading one attack at 80% for two at 50% each, which is nearly a wash even under these 'good' circumstances. I don't really think you are getting enough to justify the feat unless you are regularly facing +20 armor bonuses and for some reason can't match that with an attack bonus.</p><p></p><p>Your mention of the Paladin's smite is worthy though. A paladin needs that smite to hit hard and every little bit will help, I just wonder whether a Paladin can afford the feat on his small feat budget. </p><p></p><p>As far as the 'ride by attack' goes, all of that evading a round to study the foe opens you up to being charged and to missile fire. It doesn't do you much good (and I know it would do my NPC's very little good vs. the sort of PC's I usually have) to open up the distance like that if it is just going to draw a barrage of longbow fire and fireballs, nor are you really separating yourself if you have to spend that standard action plotting tactics unless you have a really fast mount. I know you aren't really getting separation by just being 'springy' (unless you have a movement enhancement). For this reason, I think the feat might have good synergy with anti-charge feats like 'hold the line' (which IMO as a DM is a good feat to take anyway if you plan to keep your front line fighter alive in the long run).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 919867, member: 4937"] Gaiden: Yes, leaving aside some rules issues that is basically true. But, even so you are still talking about a very limited special circumstance feat. Most springy types I've encountered are rogues, or at least multi-classed rogue/fighter/duelists/shadow dancers in some combination. It is certainly not clear to me that attacking every other round (or half the time you are able) is worth a small bonus to hit. In most cases, I suspect that if you worked out the numbers the iterative attack sequence would do more damage than something with a small bonus to hit. Remember, a 20 always hits. Imagine the situation of a 3 attack character who needs a 10 on his first attack vs. something with 12 armor bonus. You are trading a single attack at a 80% chance of hitting, for one attack at 50%, one at 25%, and one at 5%. That's about a wash. Looking over the course of the whole cycle, you are basically trading one attack at 80% for two at 50% each, which is nearly a wash even under these 'good' circumstances. I don't really think you are getting enough to justify the feat unless you are regularly facing +20 armor bonuses and for some reason can't match that with an attack bonus. Your mention of the Paladin's smite is worthy though. A paladin needs that smite to hit hard and every little bit will help, I just wonder whether a Paladin can afford the feat on his small feat budget. As far as the 'ride by attack' goes, all of that evading a round to study the foe opens you up to being charged and to missile fire. It doesn't do you much good (and I know it would do my NPC's very little good vs. the sort of PC's I usually have) to open up the distance like that if it is just going to draw a barrage of longbow fire and fireballs, nor are you really separating yourself if you have to spend that standard action plotting tactics unless you have a really fast mount. I know you aren't really getting separation by just being 'springy' (unless you have a movement enhancement). For this reason, I think the feat might have good synergy with anti-charge feats like 'hold the line' (which IMO as a DM is a good feat to take anyway if you plan to keep your front line fighter alive in the long run). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Chink in the Armor
Top