Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Eyes in the Back of Your Head
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Furn_Darkside" data-source="post: 253129" data-attributes="member: 210"><p>Salutations,</p><p></p><p>This feet has been a write off in our group.</p><p></p><p>As I look at it, I think it is too weak for any use. I can't see it ever being taken. Anyone with that wis is most likely a caster- and would be better off taking a feat that helped their magic.</p><p></p><p>So, there are three options- </p><p></p><p>1) If one raises the BAB and get rid of the Wis requirement, then the feat is probably fine the way it is written.</p><p></p><p>2) If one raises the BAB and keeps the Wis requirement, then make the feat change to: opponents who flank a character with this feat gain no benefit from flanking(bonus to hit, sneak attacks, etc). Keep the bit about it only working while not denied their dex.</p><p></p><p>Since the second proposal is rather powerful, I think the BAB requirement should be at least around 13+</p><p></p><p>3) If one keeps the BAB requirement and gets rid of the Wis requirement, then you could change the feat to the following: at the beginning of each combat round, a character with this feat may select a number of people equal to their Wis bonus that will not receive any bonus to hit gained from flanking this character for the rest of the round.</p><p></p><p>I like #2 just because there are so few high level feat for combat, but I would go for #3. It is geared for combatants and rewards a decent wisdom.</p><p></p><p>Respectfully submitted</p><p>FD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Furn_Darkside, post: 253129, member: 210"] Salutations, This feet has been a write off in our group. As I look at it, I think it is too weak for any use. I can't see it ever being taken. Anyone with that wis is most likely a caster- and would be better off taking a feat that helped their magic. So, there are three options- 1) If one raises the BAB and get rid of the Wis requirement, then the feat is probably fine the way it is written. 2) If one raises the BAB and keeps the Wis requirement, then make the feat change to: opponents who flank a character with this feat gain no benefit from flanking(bonus to hit, sneak attacks, etc). Keep the bit about it only working while not denied their dex. Since the second proposal is rather powerful, I think the BAB requirement should be at least around 13+ 3) If one keeps the BAB requirement and gets rid of the Wis requirement, then you could change the feat to the following: at the beginning of each combat round, a character with this feat may select a number of people equal to their Wis bonus that will not receive any bonus to hit gained from flanking this character for the rest of the round. I like #2 just because there are so few high level feat for combat, but I would go for #3. It is geared for combatants and rewards a decent wisdom. Respectfully submitted FD [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Eyes in the Back of Your Head
Top