Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Furn_Darkside" data-source="post: 254364" data-attributes="member: 210">Heh, I should have been more clear about that, I was referring to you suggesting a monk could get EitBoYH for whirlwind. I apologize for being confusing. I never said that everyone does use a point system. I started my original post about how this has been written off by my group.I don't quite see the point in classifying every statements as an opinion. Especially in a discussion asking out opinions on a feet. You have a kind dm if they are using Tumble as written- it must be nice to be able to tumble by great wyrms with ease. And it has a rather weak power- just a notch below EitBoYH. (Someone should put a limit on the number of words that can be used in a feat's name, heh.) You can always take thief levels before joining the monostary. I don't believe every feat should be easily accessable to every character, but if they want a low ability feat for monks- then there are better ways to do it then put on a stupid requirement. Really? Wow. I would never consider it.. especially at that level. There are better feats out there. At that level, a monk should not even be concerned with the +2 to hit from flanking. I would rather take one of the * Toughness feats from MotW, a save boosting feat, or better yet one of the monk oriented feats in OA.It would be a shame that one of my last feats, of the few feats I might have, would be wasted on this pitiful feat. Granted, that is a general problem with the core rule books- no good high level combat feats.all IMO- of course. heh.Respectfully submittedFD</blockquote>

Verification