Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Incantatrix
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tzarevitch" data-source="post: 952287" data-attributes="member: 1792"><p>The class is quite good. It is one of the better classes for an arcane caster and it is VERY GOOD for sorcerers. The requirement for abjuration specialist is painful for Wizards but much less so for sorcerers b/c you have a limited spell selection anyway. Most sorcerers tend to "specialize" anyway. They have a limited spell selection so they tend to choose spells for a particular thematic effect and be VERY good with them rather than have an ecclectic mix of spells to cover all areas like wizards do. </p><p></p><p>As for the complaints that it is broken; it isn't. What was broken was the lack of clarity regarding metamagic feats that were reduced cost or free and stacking rules for metamagic. If you use the 3.5 rule that you can't metamagic for free or reduced cost, any spell that you couldn't have metamagicked without the reduction, the problem is solved. If indeed 3.5 prevents stacking the same metamagic feat then also; problem solved.</p><p></p><p>Also as has been pointed out, you can't empower any of the animal aspect spells in 3.5 so that abuse goes away as well.</p><p></p><p>Improved Metamagic is not game breaking by any means. If people are regarding reduced-cost metamagic as "broken" how are they handling the Instant Metamagic ability that the Incantatrix has or the free metamagics that come from a metamagic rod? </p><p></p><p>Someone brought up the Archmage class. Archmage is fantastic for sorcerers. The entry requirements are PAINFUL but it is much better for sorcerers than for wizards because sorcerers are not coughing up spells-known, they are coughing up slots of which they usually have more than they will use in a day. Even one level is great for sorcerers b/c you can take that ability that allows you to freely substitute energy-types. It gives sorcerers tremendous flexibility in dealing damage. </p><p></p><p>Tzarevitch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tzarevitch, post: 952287, member: 1792"] The class is quite good. It is one of the better classes for an arcane caster and it is VERY GOOD for sorcerers. The requirement for abjuration specialist is painful for Wizards but much less so for sorcerers b/c you have a limited spell selection anyway. Most sorcerers tend to "specialize" anyway. They have a limited spell selection so they tend to choose spells for a particular thematic effect and be VERY good with them rather than have an ecclectic mix of spells to cover all areas like wizards do. As for the complaints that it is broken; it isn't. What was broken was the lack of clarity regarding metamagic feats that were reduced cost or free and stacking rules for metamagic. If you use the 3.5 rule that you can't metamagic for free or reduced cost, any spell that you couldn't have metamagicked without the reduction, the problem is solved. If indeed 3.5 prevents stacking the same metamagic feat then also; problem solved. Also as has been pointed out, you can't empower any of the animal aspect spells in 3.5 so that abuse goes away as well. Improved Metamagic is not game breaking by any means. If people are regarding reduced-cost metamagic as "broken" how are they handling the Instant Metamagic ability that the Incantatrix has or the free metamagics that come from a metamagic rod? Someone brought up the Archmage class. Archmage is fantastic for sorcerers. The entry requirements are PAINFUL but it is much better for sorcerers than for wizards because sorcerers are not coughing up spells-known, they are coughing up slots of which they usually have more than they will use in a day. Even one level is great for sorcerers b/c you can take that ability that allows you to freely substitute energy-types. It gives sorcerers tremendous flexibility in dealing damage. Tzarevitch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Incantatrix
Top