Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pax" data-source="post: 333497" data-attributes="member: 6875">Just because the Sage says something, doesn't make it a rule -- not until it is in said errata.And no, you are orrect, teh feat doesn't say the weapon needs to be capable of a trip attack.  IT simply says you can MAKE a trip atatck as a free action.Then, you need to read the rules regarding trip attacks -- which, by the by, can only be MADE by certain weapons.That lack of a log, by the way, is part of what devalues "The Sage's Rulings" in comparison with the errata.And the FAQ still stands well below the Errata.I have, by the way, read the errata's Knockdown (it's at the top of the bloody thread, pay closer attention next time).  I simply disagree with how it was errata'd.  References to FAQs and such -other- people have brought in, to try and rfute my reasoning behind the objection.I don't see the Sword and Fist version as having needed the limitation of not leading to Improved Trip's follow-up  attack, given there is NO indication in the Feat as presented in the official rules, with or without errata that there are exceptions to the need to use a trip-capable weapon, or to the risk of a counter-trip if your trip-attempt fails.</blockquote>