Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ratama" data-source="post: 394478" data-attributes="member: 7296">Maybe if you actually bothered to learn anything about medieval weaponry...<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes    :rolleyes:"  data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> In fact, it is possible to wield a zweihander in one hand (it's not even very difficult), so please don't go around warping impressionable young minds with uneducated fallacies.If for some reason you develop the ambition to educate yourself, I recommend your local library and your local SCA chapter as two decent starting points; if you can't get your butt off the couch, then at least tune into the History channel once in a while, ok? More research less guesswork, please.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />If you don't want Monkey Grip in your campaign, then don't use it; but the actual silliness with that feat is that it IS a feat, instead of merely a poor tactic on the part of the warrior (obviously, someone should better off using a weapon designed to be used in one hand if they are dual-wielding or using a shield).If you want a realistic take, just assign a -4 penalty to hit when using a two-handed weapon in one hand, and simply don't allow any feats to negate that penalty under any circumstances.</blockquote>

Verification