Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate the Archmage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merlion" data-source="post: 705002" data-attributes="member: 10397"><p>I'm sorry that wasnt neccsarily worded well. I think when they are designing products they arent giving as much attention as they used to wether a certain thing can be abused especialy via combinations(such as the Spell Power +6 Spell Penetration Greater Spell Penetration Spell Focus Greater Spell focus deal someone mentioned). I think they are addressing things like haste because of complaints and feedback about it. And I think many things in the revisions are aimed less at "broken" overpowered things and more at unclear items..and in fact it seems that the revisions to the classes will actualy involve giving them more features and making them more "powerful" rather than the reverse.</p><p> I remember that in 2nd edition..and I could be wrong about this but I seem to remember...that there were passages actualy in the rules speaking against min/maxing etc. and I seem to remember...although I dont recall which designer it was or in what forum..basicaly saying that with 3e they were no longer going to try and fight min/maxing but rather imbrace it and simmply come up with a system that was equally suited to all play styles.</p><p> I just dont believe spell power is "broken" because it can ALLOW you to get a +6 to your DCs. It doesnt automaticaly give you that...you have to choose that particular sequence of abilities. Some players are going to do that..for various reasons. Some arent, for various reasons. if a player decides to create an ArchMage Red Wizard with spell power +12(or however high it is you can get it with the 2) on his school of choice, then are those prestige classes broken because that CAN BE DONE with them...or is that character broken and constructed purely to be as powerful as possible with little or no consideration to anything else? If in your campaign an Archmage being able to achieve a +6 bonuses to save DCs doesnt work then only allow spell Power to be taken twice. or once. or eleminate that from the list of High Arcana. But dont say the class is "unbalanced" "broken" or "badly designed" because it doesnt fit in with your play style on a mechanics level, and/or because players can choose to use it to create munckin characters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merlion, post: 705002, member: 10397"] I'm sorry that wasnt neccsarily worded well. I think when they are designing products they arent giving as much attention as they used to wether a certain thing can be abused especialy via combinations(such as the Spell Power +6 Spell Penetration Greater Spell Penetration Spell Focus Greater Spell focus deal someone mentioned). I think they are addressing things like haste because of complaints and feedback about it. And I think many things in the revisions are aimed less at "broken" overpowered things and more at unclear items..and in fact it seems that the revisions to the classes will actualy involve giving them more features and making them more "powerful" rather than the reverse. I remember that in 2nd edition..and I could be wrong about this but I seem to remember...that there were passages actualy in the rules speaking against min/maxing etc. and I seem to remember...although I dont recall which designer it was or in what forum..basicaly saying that with 3e they were no longer going to try and fight min/maxing but rather imbrace it and simmply come up with a system that was equally suited to all play styles. I just dont believe spell power is "broken" because it can ALLOW you to get a +6 to your DCs. It doesnt automaticaly give you that...you have to choose that particular sequence of abilities. Some players are going to do that..for various reasons. Some arent, for various reasons. if a player decides to create an ArchMage Red Wizard with spell power +12(or however high it is you can get it with the 2) on his school of choice, then are those prestige classes broken because that CAN BE DONE with them...or is that character broken and constructed purely to be as powerful as possible with little or no consideration to anything else? If in your campaign an Archmage being able to achieve a +6 bonuses to save DCs doesnt work then only allow spell Power to be taken twice. or once. or eleminate that from the list of High Arcana. But dont say the class is "unbalanced" "broken" or "badly designed" because it doesnt fit in with your play style on a mechanics level, and/or because players can choose to use it to create munckin characters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate the Archmage
Top