Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate the Cavalier
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 747300" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>BALANCE:</p><p></p><p>The class is quite balanced, as long as the Cavalier is effectively fighting on mount. Once he is unable to ride, for example in a dungeon based adventure or indoor scene, the Cavalier is left more or less as a Featless Fighter (given the fact that he is likely to have spent most of his feats to qualify for the PrCl which therefore are mounted feats). It makes for a better villain who meets the PCs on his own ground than for a PC, generally.</p><p></p><p>FEATURES:</p><p></p><p>Most of the new features are quite tasteless bonuses to Ride and Lance or Sword attacks while mounted, or movement facilies. They are all going to be useful, and being a Cavalier is the only way to get these focuses, but they are definitely not too much exciting.</p><p></p><p>FLAVOR/RP:</p><p></p><p>The class seems to represent quite an archetype of jousting knight, with a honor bound to a kingdom, a lord or noble family or similar authority. It can be thought of as a western counterpart for the Samurai, with the code of conduct left for the player or the DM to define; hence, while the overall concept is simple and solid, there is still space for campaign customization. This is not necessarily a good property for prestige classes, which originally were supposed to be very specific "careers", but on the other hand it increments the usability of the Cavalier to more characters.</p><p></p><p>REQUIREMENTS:</p><p></p><p>The Lawful alignment requirement is very in line with the idea of this PrCl.</p><p></p><p>The high BAB required makes it implicit that the PrCl is for elite warriors, as well as the high number of feats: particularly, four of five feats imply that the character is already expert in fighting on </p><p>mount, which makes it clear what all Cavaliers have in common.</p><p></p><p>Skills needed make very sense, but it's good that the rank required is not too high, and don't penalize too much characters which must take them as cross-class.</p><p></p><p>An equipment requirement is almost always a bad mistake: exceptions should be rare and should regard the process of getting into an organization. This class is not the case, since which group the Cavalier is going to be a part of, if any, is left open.</p><p></p><p>DESIGN:</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, this PrCl has several little incomprehensible design weaknesses.</p><p></p><p>Handle Animal should be definitely a class skill, since it is a prerequisite and a Cavalier can't be in any way less facilitated in training his mount than a normal Fighter is. The entry about Knowledge(Nobility) and Burst of Speed are fine after the errata, but the Full Mounted Attack ability needs a real explanation or it doesn't make sense at all. Furthermore, some class features have an irregular level progression for no apparent reason.</p><p></p><p>A little more attention when editing this PrCl would have made a much better result.</p><p></p><p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p></p><p>OVERALL: 5</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 747300, member: 1465"] BALANCE: The class is quite balanced, as long as the Cavalier is effectively fighting on mount. Once he is unable to ride, for example in a dungeon based adventure or indoor scene, the Cavalier is left more or less as a Featless Fighter (given the fact that he is likely to have spent most of his feats to qualify for the PrCl which therefore are mounted feats). It makes for a better villain who meets the PCs on his own ground than for a PC, generally. FEATURES: Most of the new features are quite tasteless bonuses to Ride and Lance or Sword attacks while mounted, or movement facilies. They are all going to be useful, and being a Cavalier is the only way to get these focuses, but they are definitely not too much exciting. FLAVOR/RP: The class seems to represent quite an archetype of jousting knight, with a honor bound to a kingdom, a lord or noble family or similar authority. It can be thought of as a western counterpart for the Samurai, with the code of conduct left for the player or the DM to define; hence, while the overall concept is simple and solid, there is still space for campaign customization. This is not necessarily a good property for prestige classes, which originally were supposed to be very specific "careers", but on the other hand it increments the usability of the Cavalier to more characters. REQUIREMENTS: The Lawful alignment requirement is very in line with the idea of this PrCl. The high BAB required makes it implicit that the PrCl is for elite warriors, as well as the high number of feats: particularly, four of five feats imply that the character is already expert in fighting on mount, which makes it clear what all Cavaliers have in common. Skills needed make very sense, but it's good that the rank required is not too high, and don't penalize too much characters which must take them as cross-class. An equipment requirement is almost always a bad mistake: exceptions should be rare and should regard the process of getting into an organization. This class is not the case, since which group the Cavalier is going to be a part of, if any, is left open. DESIGN: Unfortunately, this PrCl has several little incomprehensible design weaknesses. Handle Animal should be definitely a class skill, since it is a prerequisite and a Cavalier can't be in any way less facilitated in training his mount than a normal Fighter is. The entry about Knowledge(Nobility) and Burst of Speed are fine after the errata, but the Full Mounted Attack ability needs a real explanation or it doesn't make sense at all. Furthermore, some class features have an irregular level progression for no apparent reason. A little more attention when editing this PrCl would have made a much better result. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERALL: 5 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate the Cavalier
Top