Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate the Shadowdancer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 691968" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>BALANCE:</p><p></p><p>The class is pretty powerful, and that's quite fine, since it's a PrCl. Compared for example with the Rogue (same proficiencies, same BAB, same ST, uncanny dodge), it loses 2 sp/level and Sneak Attack for many more special abilities than the Rogue class.</p><p></p><p>FEATURES:</p><p></p><p>The main and most powerful abilities are new and unique for the SD: Hide in Plain Sight, Summon Shadow and Shadow Jump can be very effective and creatively combined with the base class abilities, eventually spells.</p><p></p><p>Darkvision, although might be redundant with the racial ability, is also very welcome, but basically there is nothing that a PC may find unuseful from this class' special abilities.</p><p></p><p>FLAVOR/RP:</p><p></p><p>I think the concept of this PrCl is one of the most original I have seen, at least for non-spellcasting classes. It is a very rogueish character with mastery in shadow-related but very different things and for very different purposes (defense, backstabbing, stalking, travelling/teleportation, companion/battle support).</p><p></p><p>It looks so special that I would rather tie the PrCl to an organization, such as a guild: to leave it easily open for everyone would spoil a lot of flavor of it, IMHO.</p><p></p><p>REQUIREMENTS:</p><p></p><p>Not very hard to qualify for, the requirements simply reflect the base of the class to be in agility and stealth. A good thing that no requirement exclude any class to qualify for the SD.</p><p></p><p>It seems to me that the Perform requirement was deliberately set lower than the other not to become an extra delay for Rangers to qualify.</p><p></p><p>DESIGN:</p><p></p><p>Some gaming groups have had problems with a couple of abilities being quite easy to abuse, but I think a prepared DM can handle them. Apart from that, the overall design is very inspired and careful.</p><p></p><p>I think a d6 (or even d4) for HD would have been more appropriate, but it's a minor complaint.</p><p></p><p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p></p><p>OVERALL: 10</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 691968, member: 1465"] BALANCE: The class is pretty powerful, and that's quite fine, since it's a PrCl. Compared for example with the Rogue (same proficiencies, same BAB, same ST, uncanny dodge), it loses 2 sp/level and Sneak Attack for many more special abilities than the Rogue class. FEATURES: The main and most powerful abilities are new and unique for the SD: Hide in Plain Sight, Summon Shadow and Shadow Jump can be very effective and creatively combined with the base class abilities, eventually spells. Darkvision, although might be redundant with the racial ability, is also very welcome, but basically there is nothing that a PC may find unuseful from this class' special abilities. FLAVOR/RP: I think the concept of this PrCl is one of the most original I have seen, at least for non-spellcasting classes. It is a very rogueish character with mastery in shadow-related but very different things and for very different purposes (defense, backstabbing, stalking, travelling/teleportation, companion/battle support). It looks so special that I would rather tie the PrCl to an organization, such as a guild: to leave it easily open for everyone would spoil a lot of flavor of it, IMHO. REQUIREMENTS: Not very hard to qualify for, the requirements simply reflect the base of the class to be in agility and stealth. A good thing that no requirement exclude any class to qualify for the SD. It seems to me that the Perform requirement was deliberately set lower than the other not to become an extra delay for Rangers to qualify. DESIGN: Some gaming groups have had problems with a couple of abilities being quite easy to abuse, but I think a prepared DM can handle them. Apart from that, the overall design is very inspired and careful. I think a d6 (or even d4) for HD would have been more appropriate, but it's a minor complaint. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERALL: 10 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate the Shadowdancer
Top