Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Please tell me about processors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rackhir" data-source="post: 4992555" data-attributes="member: 149"><p>That's where the "avoid the integrated graphics" comes in and the list of decent basic video cards. Pretty much any system with a PCIe video card will be able to do the 1080p. IME, integrated graphics are a sign that you should simply avoid the computer, if there are no options for upgrading that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>According to all the testing I've seen. Most people can not tell the differences between 1080i/720p and 1080p on less than a 50" TV. Now I'm talking about video not still images. 30 frames per second covers up a multitude of sins in individual video frames.</p><p></p><p>I've seen a lot of comparison threads showing the same frame from the DVD and the Blu ray disks and while there is a clear difference most of the time, you do have to look for the small details to tell the difference. It's at best an incremental difference, not a night and day one.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>They can scale to the larger size, you don't have to scale them. A lot of the time you are better off not scaling the videos. A small "sharp" video is better than a large, fuzzy, pixilated image IME.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This was basically my point about "number of pixels not being <u>directly related</u> to picture quality".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a bad example. It only shows that you don't bother to close tabs. The number of tabs you have open is irrelevant to how much processing power you need. HTML rendering simply doesn't require that much of a processor and you're only rendering the one tab showing in any case. I've often had a ton of "tabs" up while doing a bunch of other things on a fairly low powered machine at work and it didn't slow things down in the slightest. A dual core gives you at least one core for system tasks and one for what ever your "primary" activity is. Very, very few people are doing something or using software that requires more than that.</p><p></p><p>As far as "typical" users go, that is rather the point of asking the OP questions about what they need isn't it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rackhir, post: 4992555, member: 149"] That's where the "avoid the integrated graphics" comes in and the list of decent basic video cards. Pretty much any system with a PCIe video card will be able to do the 1080p. IME, integrated graphics are a sign that you should simply avoid the computer, if there are no options for upgrading that. According to all the testing I've seen. Most people can not tell the differences between 1080i/720p and 1080p on less than a 50" TV. Now I'm talking about video not still images. 30 frames per second covers up a multitude of sins in individual video frames. I've seen a lot of comparison threads showing the same frame from the DVD and the Blu ray disks and while there is a clear difference most of the time, you do have to look for the small details to tell the difference. It's at best an incremental difference, not a night and day one. They can scale to the larger size, you don't have to scale them. A lot of the time you are better off not scaling the videos. A small "sharp" video is better than a large, fuzzy, pixilated image IME. This was basically my point about "number of pixels not being [U]directly related[/U] to picture quality". That's a bad example. It only shows that you don't bother to close tabs. The number of tabs you have open is irrelevant to how much processing power you need. HTML rendering simply doesn't require that much of a processor and you're only rendering the one tab showing in any case. I've often had a ton of "tabs" up while doing a bunch of other things on a fairly low powered machine at work and it didn't slow things down in the slightest. A dual core gives you at least one core for system tasks and one for what ever your "primary" activity is. Very, very few people are doing something or using software that requires more than that. As far as "typical" users go, that is rather the point of asking the OP questions about what they need isn't it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Please tell me about processors
Top