Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point buy or Dice?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 6523566" data-attributes="member: 5100"><p>My general opinion on the points/dice quandary is that it depends on how gamist the group is. By that, I mean how much the game is designed to test the players, rather than the characters, and I mean that in a very broad sense. The main reason is that I want to see both edges of the sword sharp; if you've got the potential for rolling all 18s, you shouldn't expect to be shielded (much) from getting all 3s. If it's just a matter of wanting to be better than what's possible with point buy, the group should discuss handing out more points (per 3E). Having a below average character can be fun, but significantly increases the odds of getting dead, which really messes up a narrative, thus should be reserved for groups that look at it as more of a strategy game than cooperative story telling (caveats apply).</p><p></p><p>While I'm willing to play at a gamist table, my group tends to be more of a casual approach to a heroic tale, with enough dice to add some spice (which is my preference, too). A point here or there isn't a big deal, but too much swing between PCs tends to remove the heroic aspect from some of them -- even when it's average vs. above average. When we picked up 5E, I left it up to the players; two used points and two rolled. Of those that rolled, the other had (after racial mods) an 18, two 16s, and nothing under 10. It quickly became his show, with the other PCs as supporting cast, not because he was a better player, but because he didn't have much need to rely on anyone else, other than as meat shields. Since we were explicitly in a test mode, we eventually had him level off the character to a point buy and things went to even footing.</p><p></p><p>Like I said, it's a style thing. Neither way is "wrong", but each facilitates different play experiences. If I was going through Tomb of Horrors or Rappan Athuk, I'd absolutely be up for random scores and ability score minimums for various classes/races. Good times. Doing Dragonlance, Ravenloft (I6), or even Age Of Worms, not so much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 6523566, member: 5100"] My general opinion on the points/dice quandary is that it depends on how gamist the group is. By that, I mean how much the game is designed to test the players, rather than the characters, and I mean that in a very broad sense. The main reason is that I want to see both edges of the sword sharp; if you've got the potential for rolling all 18s, you shouldn't expect to be shielded (much) from getting all 3s. If it's just a matter of wanting to be better than what's possible with point buy, the group should discuss handing out more points (per 3E). Having a below average character can be fun, but significantly increases the odds of getting dead, which really messes up a narrative, thus should be reserved for groups that look at it as more of a strategy game than cooperative story telling (caveats apply). While I'm willing to play at a gamist table, my group tends to be more of a casual approach to a heroic tale, with enough dice to add some spice (which is my preference, too). A point here or there isn't a big deal, but too much swing between PCs tends to remove the heroic aspect from some of them -- even when it's average vs. above average. When we picked up 5E, I left it up to the players; two used points and two rolled. Of those that rolled, the other had (after racial mods) an 18, two 16s, and nothing under 10. It quickly became his show, with the other PCs as supporting cast, not because he was a better player, but because he didn't have much need to rely on anyone else, other than as meat shields. Since we were explicitly in a test mode, we eventually had him level off the character to a point buy and things went to even footing. Like I said, it's a style thing. Neither way is "wrong", but each facilitates different play experiences. If I was going through Tomb of Horrors or Rappan Athuk, I'd absolutely be up for random scores and ability score minimums for various classes/races. Good times. Doing Dragonlance, Ravenloft (I6), or even Age Of Worms, not so much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point buy or Dice?
Top