Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ilbranteloth" data-source="post: 7209460" data-attributes="member: 6778044"><p>Nope, not my intention at all.</p><p></p><p>I think I'm pretty good at pointing out that my approach is just that, my approach. It's not for everybody, and I don't begin to pretend it is.</p><p></p><p>And the sentence you didn't include that immediately preceded that was "And if I sat down at your table I'd happily play your game with your rules." </p><p></p><p>And the response as a whole was in direct response to: "But if I sat at your table and you told me I had to do this bulls*it, I'd get up and leave."</p><p></p><p>That leads me to believe that [MENTION=6857879]neogod22[/MENTION] has not tried it. More importantly, their response, as well as those by others, regarding how the system works, or the ramifications of using such a system don't match my experience using the approach for a long time. Which also leads me to believe that the approach as we apply it in our campaign is different than what others think it is. </p><p></p><p>It's not the "real" way, it's a different way. It wasn't even the "default" way until 2e (the "default" or Method I in AD&D was 4d6, drop one, arrange as desired). </p><p></p><p>I really have no idea whether [MENTION=6857879]neogod22[/MENTION] has tried it. That was a legitimate question. And after all the time that I've played, I have honestly found that this is the approach I/we like best. That's a simple observation of my own experience and statement of fact regarding our table. The fact that we build the characters together, rather than at home by ourselves is another part of the process we use, and I think is probably pretty different from how most folks that use point buy/optimization do, and also a big part of the fun of rolling for stats instead of a point buy. At least for us.</p><p></p><p>I even ended that comment with "I'm not saying everybody will like it" and followed it with several other paragraphs as to how we try to accommodate those who really just don't like it if they decide to sit down at one of my tables. </p><p></p><p>On the other hand, I play D&D, and I'm always proselytizing that. Because it <em>is</em> the best game ever! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ilbranteloth, post: 7209460, member: 6778044"] Nope, not my intention at all. I think I'm pretty good at pointing out that my approach is just that, my approach. It's not for everybody, and I don't begin to pretend it is. And the sentence you didn't include that immediately preceded that was "And if I sat down at your table I'd happily play your game with your rules." And the response as a whole was in direct response to: "But if I sat at your table and you told me I had to do this bulls*it, I'd get up and leave." That leads me to believe that [MENTION=6857879]neogod22[/MENTION] has not tried it. More importantly, their response, as well as those by others, regarding how the system works, or the ramifications of using such a system don't match my experience using the approach for a long time. Which also leads me to believe that the approach as we apply it in our campaign is different than what others think it is. It's not the "real" way, it's a different way. It wasn't even the "default" way until 2e (the "default" or Method I in AD&D was 4d6, drop one, arrange as desired). I really have no idea whether [MENTION=6857879]neogod22[/MENTION] has tried it. That was a legitimate question. And after all the time that I've played, I have honestly found that this is the approach I/we like best. That's a simple observation of my own experience and statement of fact regarding our table. The fact that we build the characters together, rather than at home by ourselves is another part of the process we use, and I think is probably pretty different from how most folks that use point buy/optimization do, and also a big part of the fun of rolling for stats instead of a point buy. At least for us. I even ended that comment with "I'm not saying everybody will like it" and followed it with several other paragraphs as to how we try to accommodate those who really just don't like it if they decide to sit down at one of my tables. On the other hand, I play D&D, and I'm always proselytizing that. Because it [I]is[/I] the best game ever! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top