Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7211055" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>'Forcing someone to play a dwarf' would mean that they have to play a PC they don't like for an entire campaign. That could be a long time!</p><p></p><p>'Forcing someone to create their PC using 4d6k3'.....actually is <strong>not</strong> forcing them to play a PC they don't like! You are the one who makes your PC, even if it begins with six scores that you didn't choose. Guess what, using the standard array is also starting with six scores you didn't choose! Using point-buy is starting with a total you didn't choose! It's a complaint which doesn't hold water.</p><p></p><p>The reality is that each and every stat generation has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, whether that method is array, point-buy, roll in order, roll with conditional re-rolls, simply <em>choosing whatever scores match your concept</em>, whatever.</p><p></p><p>It's perfectly okay to prefer one method over the others, perfectly okay to dislike a method. It's almost impossible not to have a preference. I've got no problem with anyone's preference, even if it doesn't match mine.</p><p></p><p>But two things: first, it is possible that people make provably incorrect statements, or misleading statements, about their reasons for their preferences. 'Point-buy means that everyone can play what they want to play' is such a statement. Second, the idea that a game uses your <em>second</em> favourite method means you'd walk away from the game? Really? That is either hyperbole or a revealing insight into your personality.</p><p></p><p>I like ice cream. My favourite flavour is raspberry ripple! I also like vanilla, strawberry ripple....strawberry ice cream is okay....I don't like chocolate ice cream though, even though I like chocolate. Weird, huh?</p><p></p><p>If I can choose any three scoops from a choice of 20 flavours I'd choose 3 scoops of raspberry ripple every time! But if someone wants to buy me one, but one scoop has to be vanilla, fine; free ice cream!</p><p></p><p>Imagine someone wants to buy me an ice cream. They don't have any raspberry ripple left. Would I really say, "<em>Straw</em>berry ripple? Are you kidding me? I'm outta here!"?</p><p></p><p>You don't want to play Joe the Plumber. Fine. You don't want to play Superman. Fine. But the idea that you would rather walk away and not play at all, rather than play a 26 or 28 point PC <em>of your own design</em>, is absurd.</p><p></p><p>If it is really true that you are unwilling to play any PC who doesn't add up to 27 points, then how could you object if the system was 'choose whatever scores match your concept'? You already have an idea-space that is <em>exclusively</em> filled with 27 point PCs, so you can go ahead and use one of your concepts. Would you stay with the game on the grounds that you can play a PC you find acceptable? Or would you walk away because other people might make PCs that <em>you</em> wouldn't like? Or would you walk away because <em>any</em> system that isn't 27 point-buy is...what? Immoral?</p><p></p><p>What would you think of someone who gets the 3 ice cream scoops they ask for, but walks out of the shop without any ice cream on the grounds that someone else choose different scoops?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7211055, member: 6799649"] 'Forcing someone to play a dwarf' would mean that they have to play a PC they don't like for an entire campaign. That could be a long time! 'Forcing someone to create their PC using 4d6k3'.....actually is [B]not[/B] forcing them to play a PC they don't like! You are the one who makes your PC, even if it begins with six scores that you didn't choose. Guess what, using the standard array is also starting with six scores you didn't choose! Using point-buy is starting with a total you didn't choose! It's a complaint which doesn't hold water. The reality is that each and every stat generation has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, whether that method is array, point-buy, roll in order, roll with conditional re-rolls, simply [I]choosing whatever scores match your concept[/I], whatever. It's perfectly okay to prefer one method over the others, perfectly okay to dislike a method. It's almost impossible not to have a preference. I've got no problem with anyone's preference, even if it doesn't match mine. But two things: first, it is possible that people make provably incorrect statements, or misleading statements, about their reasons for their preferences. 'Point-buy means that everyone can play what they want to play' is such a statement. Second, the idea that a game uses your [I]second[/I] favourite method means you'd walk away from the game? Really? That is either hyperbole or a revealing insight into your personality. I like ice cream. My favourite flavour is raspberry ripple! I also like vanilla, strawberry ripple....strawberry ice cream is okay....I don't like chocolate ice cream though, even though I like chocolate. Weird, huh? If I can choose any three scoops from a choice of 20 flavours I'd choose 3 scoops of raspberry ripple every time! But if someone wants to buy me one, but one scoop has to be vanilla, fine; free ice cream! Imagine someone wants to buy me an ice cream. They don't have any raspberry ripple left. Would I really say, "[I]Straw[/I]berry ripple? Are you kidding me? I'm outta here!"? You don't want to play Joe the Plumber. Fine. You don't want to play Superman. Fine. But the idea that you would rather walk away and not play at all, rather than play a 26 or 28 point PC [I]of your own design[/I], is absurd. If it is really true that you are unwilling to play any PC who doesn't add up to 27 points, then how could you object if the system was 'choose whatever scores match your concept'? You already have an idea-space that is [I]exclusively[/I] filled with 27 point PCs, so you can go ahead and use one of your concepts. Would you stay with the game on the grounds that you can play a PC you find acceptable? Or would you walk away because other people might make PCs that [I]you[/I] wouldn't like? Or would you walk away because [I]any[/I] system that isn't 27 point-buy is...what? Immoral? What would you think of someone who gets the 3 ice cream scoops they ask for, but walks out of the shop without any ice cream on the grounds that someone else choose different scoops? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top