Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7213465" data-attributes="member: 996">Can't say I've heard of that one.&nbsp; I'm curious, what happens if you have a '6' left to distribute, and your lowest remaining score is 13?&nbsp; Tilt?I suspect it's not an issue, just wondering.Something not particularly similar that reminded me of:Each player gets a large pool of dice, like 24 or more.&nbsp; They can use as few as 3d to roll for each stat, deciding how many for each stat, then rolling, and keeping the three highest.&nbsp;&nbsp; So, with 24 dice, you could just roll 4d6 in order, and be done.&nbsp; Or, if you really wanted to play a Wizard with the highest possible INT and didn't care about any other stats, you could roll 3d for everything else (15d over 5 stats), and 9d6 for INT (which gives you a fair chance of an 18, but certainly no guarantee), for a total of 24 dice.&nbsp; Obviously, more than 24 dice wouldn't be unreasonable...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7213465, member: 996"] Can't say I've heard of that one. I'm curious, what happens if you have a '6' left to distribute, and your lowest remaining score is 13? Tilt? I suspect it's not an issue, just wondering. Something not particularly similar that reminded me of: Each player gets a large pool of dice, like 24 or more. They can use as few as 3d to roll for each stat, deciding how many for each stat, then rolling, and keeping the three highest. So, with 24 dice, you could just roll 4d6 in order, and be done. Or, if you really wanted to play a Wizard with the highest possible INT and didn't care about any other stats, you could roll 3d for everything else (15d over 5 stats), and 9d6 for INT (which gives you a fair chance of an 18, but certainly no guarantee), for a total of 24 dice. Obviously, more than 24 dice wouldn't be unreasonable... [/QUOTE]

Verification