Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7215740" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>My statement was factually correct.</p><p></p><p>I didn't state that every player has always used rolling; I said the game itself has always used rolling, from its inception to the present day.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? <em>I'm</em> getting hung up on numbers? Implying that you are not? Yet you seem hung up enough that the mere suggestion of instead of having to decide whether my smith/wizard is wise <strong>or</strong> charismatic, I instead want him to be wise <strong>and</strong> charismatic, that this is equivalent to wanting my PC to have Str 100 and shoot laser beams from my eyes!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Point-buy possesses many advantages. It's just that "it lets players play what they want" is <strong>not</strong> an advantages it can honestly claim.</p><p></p><p>If such a method is desired, then 'choose your stats to match your concept' (note the total lack of point-buy) is the method you are looking for.</p><p></p><p>If that seems unplayable, I have to say that this is the method my main group has been using for upwards of 20 years, including the final few years of 2E.</p><p></p><p>Other games use this as their default system. The Marvel Heroic Role-Playing Game is one such game. Choose your hero concept, apply the stats that match your concept. Do you have all maxed stats? Well, your buddies might roll their eyes, but it is not only rules legal it's how you realise concepts like The Silver Surfer.</p><p></p><p>As for realising fantasy concepts, we do this when we try to model heroes from books/films in terms of D&D. Let's look at the archtypal adventuring party in literature: did every PC in the Fellowship of the Ring start with 27 points? Aragorn was above average in Str, Dex, Con, Wis and Cha; are we really giving him 11s in all of those and suppose that it matches our Aragorn concept, on the grounds that '11 is above average'?</p><p></p><p>Point-buy simply is not up to the job of matching our concepts, unless we either change our concepts to match 27 points (which is the same process that you go through to change your concept to match what you rolled) or only think of concepts that add up to 27 points (which matches the idea that you only come up with a concept after you roll your stats).</p><p></p><p>Poor Aragorn, it wasn't old age that killed you, it was point-buy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7215740, member: 6799649"] My statement was factually correct. I didn't state that every player has always used rolling; I said the game itself has always used rolling, from its inception to the present day. Really? [i]I'm[/i] getting hung up on numbers? Implying that you are not? Yet you seem hung up enough that the mere suggestion of instead of having to decide whether my smith/wizard is wise [b]or[/b] charismatic, I instead want him to be wise [b]and[/b] charismatic, that this is equivalent to wanting my PC to have Str 100 and shoot laser beams from my eyes! Point-buy possesses many advantages. It's just that "it lets players play what they want" is [b]not[/b] an advantages it can honestly claim. If such a method is desired, then 'choose your stats to match your concept' (note the total lack of point-buy) is the method you are looking for. If that seems unplayable, I have to say that this is the method my main group has been using for upwards of 20 years, including the final few years of 2E. Other games use this as their default system. The Marvel Heroic Role-Playing Game is one such game. Choose your hero concept, apply the stats that match your concept. Do you have all maxed stats? Well, your buddies might roll their eyes, but it is not only rules legal it's how you realise concepts like The Silver Surfer. As for realising fantasy concepts, we do this when we try to model heroes from books/films in terms of D&D. Let's look at the archtypal adventuring party in literature: did every PC in the Fellowship of the Ring start with 27 points? Aragorn was above average in Str, Dex, Con, Wis and Cha; are we really giving him 11s in all of those and suppose that it matches our Aragorn concept, on the grounds that '11 is above average'? Point-buy simply is not up to the job of matching our concepts, unless we either change our concepts to match 27 points (which is the same process that you go through to change your concept to match what you rolled) or only think of concepts that add up to 27 points (which matches the idea that you only come up with a concept after you roll your stats). Poor Aragorn, it wasn't old age that killed you, it was point-buy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top