Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7227803" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>What you said (while true) was said in the context of 'what are the objective advantages and disadvantages of various methods'. We understood what you said to be what you believed was an objective advantage of that method for any player that uses that method, yet it turns out that you only meant that it only works that way for you. That's misleading, although I can accept that you never <em>intended</em> to mislead.</p><p></p><p>I'll illustrate what I mean by simply saying the exact same thing you did, but apply it to the standard array of 15/14/13/12/10/8: "I use the standard array because it lets me create the concept I want".</p><p></p><p>Is this statement true? Well, it can be true in the sense that I can then qualify my statement by stating that every 'concept I want' just happens to be satisfied by some arrangement of those six stats, so I couldn't be proved to be lying.</p><p></p><p>However, in the context of 'what are the benefits and drawbacks of each method', it is <strong>not</strong> true that the standard array lets <em>players</em> play whatever concept <em>they</em> want!</p><p></p><p><em>That</em> is why I took issue with your statement. It was misleading as it seemed, in context, that you were mentioning an objective truth about the benefits of point-buy for any player that uses it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now that you've made it clear that you were only stating your strangely narrow definition of 'concepts I want', rather than stating an objective advantage of point-buy for all players, then it's all good! Enjoy your trip. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7227803, member: 6799649"] What you said (while true) was said in the context of 'what are the objective advantages and disadvantages of various methods'. We understood what you said to be what you believed was an objective advantage of that method for any player that uses that method, yet it turns out that you only meant that it only works that way for you. That's misleading, although I can accept that you never [i]intended[/i] to mislead. I'll illustrate what I mean by simply saying the exact same thing you did, but apply it to the standard array of 15/14/13/12/10/8: "I use the standard array because it lets me create the concept I want". Is this statement true? Well, it can be true in the sense that I can then qualify my statement by stating that every 'concept I want' just happens to be satisfied by some arrangement of those six stats, so I couldn't be proved to be lying. However, in the context of 'what are the benefits and drawbacks of each method', it is [b]not[/b] true that the standard array lets [i]players[/i] play whatever concept [i]they[/i] want! [i]That[/i] is why I took issue with your statement. It was misleading as it seemed, in context, that you were mentioning an objective truth about the benefits of point-buy for any player that uses it. Now that you've made it clear that you were only stating your strangely narrow definition of 'concepts I want', rather than stating an objective advantage of point-buy for all players, then it's all good! Enjoy your trip. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top