Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7233111" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>It's the other way around; it's not that 'the strongest guy in the village/town/country/world' is defined as having 18 Str, but that 18 Str defines the strongest guy in every 216 people. You don't need to make any claims about 'Str 18 is Olympic level/strongest in the village/trained/not trained'. The claim is simply that, statistically', 1-in-216 people in the general population have 18 Str.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If we apply the same criteria for evidence to either case (and we must if we are to retain credibility) then we must compare the evidence for the claim that 'the general population is modeled by the 3d6 bell curve' against the claim that 'we know NPC stats range from 3-18, therefore they are nearly all exactly 10'.</p><p></p><p>To support the bell curve case we have the 1E DMG, the 'common ancestor' of every version of D&D from 2E onwards. We also have publications like The City State of the Invincible Overlord by The Judges Guild for D&D 1E, which lists (I kid you not) <em>the entire population of the city</em>(!) with stats rolled on 3d6 in order! Why? Because that's what the general population <strong>is</strong>! And they had the time to do it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>The reason that later editions had pre-rolled stat blocks for 'commoner' NPCs is <strong>not</strong> that the underlying assumption of the bell curve was dropped but that a.) the couldn't be bothered to roll tens of thousands of stat blocks, and b.) they realised that they didn't <strong>need</strong> to, because they can pre-create representative stat blocks that the DM can whip out at need. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is a ridiculous to claim that 1st level NPCs have <strong>zero</strong> training when they already attained their 1st level class features! Along with backgrounds, this demonstrates that 1st level PCs combine some training alongside their natural abilities. This doesn't mean that they can't train even more. The 1st level PC with zero XPs is a snapshot in time of the life of that person; before that point they were less trained, after that point they will be more trained.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which just demonstrates the maxim: Garbage In, Garbage Out. If you start with false assumptions (1st level PCs have had no training) then it's no surprise that you reach a false conclusion (Olympic athletes were born with exactly the same abilities as they have when they compete, so baby high jumpers can jump just as high as their adult selves will be able to jump in the future).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7233111, member: 6799649"] It's the other way around; it's not that 'the strongest guy in the village/town/country/world' is defined as having 18 Str, but that 18 Str defines the strongest guy in every 216 people. You don't need to make any claims about 'Str 18 is Olympic level/strongest in the village/trained/not trained'. The claim is simply that, statistically', 1-in-216 people in the general population have 18 Str. If we apply the same criteria for evidence to either case (and we must if we are to retain credibility) then we must compare the evidence for the claim that 'the general population is modeled by the 3d6 bell curve' against the claim that 'we know NPC stats range from 3-18, therefore they are nearly all exactly 10'. To support the bell curve case we have the 1E DMG, the 'common ancestor' of every version of D&D from 2E onwards. We also have publications like The City State of the Invincible Overlord by The Judges Guild for D&D 1E, which lists (I kid you not) [i]the entire population of the city[/i](!) with stats rolled on 3d6 in order! Why? Because that's what the general population [b]is[/b]! And they had the time to do it. :D The reason that later editions had pre-rolled stat blocks for 'commoner' NPCs is [b]not[/b] that the underlying assumption of the bell curve was dropped but that a.) the couldn't be bothered to roll tens of thousands of stat blocks, and b.) they realised that they didn't [b]need[/b] to, because they can pre-create representative stat blocks that the DM can whip out at need. It is a ridiculous to claim that 1st level NPCs have [b]zero[/b] training when they already attained their 1st level class features! Along with backgrounds, this demonstrates that 1st level PCs combine some training alongside their natural abilities. This doesn't mean that they can't train even more. The 1st level PC with zero XPs is a snapshot in time of the life of that person; before that point they were less trained, after that point they will be more trained. Which just demonstrates the maxim: Garbage In, Garbage Out. If you start with false assumptions (1st level PCs have had no training) then it's no surprise that you reach a false conclusion (Olympic athletes were born with exactly the same abilities as they have when they compete, so baby high jumpers can jump just as high as their adult selves will be able to jump in the future). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top