Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 7234240" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>Except the point-buy vs. rolling discussion is germaine to all editions, not just 5e; and even though it's in a 5e-based forum doesn't mean all of us will automatically look at it from a 5e-only perspective. I sure don't. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>And [MENTION=996]Tony Vargas[/MENTION] is right in one thing: the 3d6 bell curve, for all its flaws ( [MENTION=22779]Hussar[/MENTION] is spot on when he points out that 3d6 gives way too many extreme results to base a general population on) was the stated default for general population creation in 1e and, as it has not really been replaced or amended since, remains the default...well...by default. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>The one thing that has changed is bonuses and how they work. In 0-1-2e there was little to no appreciable difference between an 8 and a 13 other than one's roll-under odds and - for strength - carrying capacity. The large center of the bell curve was all kinda mushed together into a big pool of 'ordinary'; and that was just fine. 3e brought in linear bonuses (bad) but did not change the 3-18 bell curve standard (bad becomes worse), meaning that all those 8-9 and 12-13 stats that previously fell under 'ordinary' now fell under 'bonus/penalty-granting'...which means 'exceptional'. 4-5e have followed on with this same poor model.</p><p></p><p>Something else that only just occurred to me while typing this: if 5e wants all commoner stats to be 10 then they're doing commoners a slight (but over a whole population, quite noticeable) disservice, in that the average of 3d6 is in fact 10.5 and commoners should thus have as many 11s as 10s. Given that the difference in average between array (12.0) and 4d6 rolling (12.24) generates so much complaint yet is less than half the difference between 10.0 and 10.5, I think it's time for the commoners and peasants to stand up and be heard! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Lan-"and when I'm in the same post saying both Hussar and Tony V are right, that alone should tell you something's in the air"-efan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 7234240, member: 29398"] Except the point-buy vs. rolling discussion is germaine to all editions, not just 5e; and even though it's in a 5e-based forum doesn't mean all of us will automatically look at it from a 5e-only perspective. I sure don't. :) And [MENTION=996]Tony Vargas[/MENTION] is right in one thing: the 3d6 bell curve, for all its flaws ( [MENTION=22779]Hussar[/MENTION] is spot on when he points out that 3d6 gives way too many extreme results to base a general population on) was the stated default for general population creation in 1e and, as it has not really been replaced or amended since, remains the default...well...by default. :) The one thing that has changed is bonuses and how they work. In 0-1-2e there was little to no appreciable difference between an 8 and a 13 other than one's roll-under odds and - for strength - carrying capacity. The large center of the bell curve was all kinda mushed together into a big pool of 'ordinary'; and that was just fine. 3e brought in linear bonuses (bad) but did not change the 3-18 bell curve standard (bad becomes worse), meaning that all those 8-9 and 12-13 stats that previously fell under 'ordinary' now fell under 'bonus/penalty-granting'...which means 'exceptional'. 4-5e have followed on with this same poor model. Something else that only just occurred to me while typing this: if 5e wants all commoner stats to be 10 then they're doing commoners a slight (but over a whole population, quite noticeable) disservice, in that the average of 3d6 is in fact 10.5 and commoners should thus have as many 11s as 10s. Given that the difference in average between array (12.0) and 4d6 rolling (12.24) generates so much complaint yet is less than half the difference between 10.0 and 10.5, I think it's time for the commoners and peasants to stand up and be heard! :) Lan-"and when I'm in the same post saying both Hussar and Tony V are right, that alone should tell you something's in the air"-efan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top