Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7238266" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Not if the point was to get through the door quietly, they didn't. Or get into the chest without breaking the potion bottles or whatever that might be inside. </p><p></p><p>And lockpicking is just one example, there's the other thief 'special' abilities that 1e locked into class in a paroxysm of niche protection. Then there's effing spells. </p><p></p><p>Claiming that class didn't matter in 1e compared to stats is sheer overwhelming nonsense, Maxperson, it's so far from right, it's not even wrong. Compound that by pretending stats are unimportant important compared to class in 5e, when BA makes stat bonuses very important even at high level, and every check can be made with or without proficiency, and, really, you're not even trying to make a point, you're just pushing back blindly with no thought whatsoever, from some sheer, perverse, irresistible compulsion to contradict. </p><p></p><p> So the expectation that the fighter's STR is going to be over-written by a magic item is somehow evidence that the stats he rolled matter? And, y'know, the gauntlets were a CFT item...</p><p></p><p> Yeah, the Thief was a terrible class, no argument. No doubt one reason it had such draconian niche protection. </p><p></p><p></p><p> You each seem to be addressing only part of the rules with your quotes. </p><p></p><p>Really, though, the exact quotes barely matter, it's all in the context of D&D as a whole - 40 years of history don't disappear because you leave a detail or turn of phrase out of the latest ed.</p><p></p><p>You want to change something, you need to change it quite explicitly. No, not by coming out and saying "sub-system X has been deprecated," like it's a programming manual, but by clearly stating the new rule or assumption that's replaced the old. Merely not addressing past assumptions, while presenting things consistent with them, leaves those assumptions available to those who've been assuming them the whole time. </p><p>Which was a politic thing to do, given 5e's goals....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7238266, member: 996"] Not if the point was to get through the door quietly, they didn't. Or get into the chest without breaking the potion bottles or whatever that might be inside. And lockpicking is just one example, there's the other thief 'special' abilities that 1e locked into class in a paroxysm of niche protection. Then there's effing spells. Claiming that class didn't matter in 1e compared to stats is sheer overwhelming nonsense, Maxperson, it's so far from right, it's not even wrong. Compound that by pretending stats are unimportant important compared to class in 5e, when BA makes stat bonuses very important even at high level, and every check can be made with or without proficiency, and, really, you're not even trying to make a point, you're just pushing back blindly with no thought whatsoever, from some sheer, perverse, irresistible compulsion to contradict. So the expectation that the fighter's STR is going to be over-written by a magic item is somehow evidence that the stats he rolled matter? And, y'know, the gauntlets were a CFT item... Yeah, the Thief was a terrible class, no argument. No doubt one reason it had such draconian niche protection. You each seem to be addressing only part of the rules with your quotes. Really, though, the exact quotes barely matter, it's all in the context of D&D as a whole - 40 years of history don't disappear because you leave a detail or turn of phrase out of the latest ed. You want to change something, you need to change it quite explicitly. No, not by coming out and saying "sub-system X has been deprecated," like it's a programming manual, but by clearly stating the new rule or assumption that's replaced the old. Merely not addressing past assumptions, while presenting things consistent with them, leaves those assumptions available to those who've been assuming them the whole time. Which was a politic thing to do, given 5e's goals.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top