Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 7249677" data-attributes="member: 284">Ah, more name calling.&nbsp; Pretty much what I've come to expect from you though.&nbsp;&nbsp; Also, I don't think you said exactly what you meant to say here. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />First you said &quot;Now, if rolling wasn't an option and he came here saying that he hates point buy, THEN it would be a complaint.&quot;So, I pointed out that by Arials own admission, rolling wasn't an option.&nbsp; &nbsp; Then you said&nbsp; &quot;So long as rolling is involved, the situation was not unsatisfactory or unacceptable to @<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=47207" target="_blank">Ariel</a> Black.&quot; -&nbsp; I pointed out that rolling is not involved.&nbsp; You immediately change your story and try to pretend you never said that.&nbsp; Now rolling doesn't need to be involved at all for it to be acceptable.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Since you insist on arguing in bad faith, I think we are done here.&nbsp; You lose.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Caliban, post: 7249677, member: 284"] Ah, more name calling. Pretty much what I've come to expect from you though. Also, I don't think you said exactly what you meant to say here. :) First you said "[B]Now, if rolling wasn't an option and he came here saying that he hates point buy, THEN it would be a complaint." [/B]So, I pointed out that by Arials own admission, rolling wasn't an option. Then you said "[B][COLOR=#333333][FONT=Verdana]So long as rolling is involved, the situation was not unsatisfactory or unacceptable to @[/FONT][/COLOR][I][U][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=47207"]Ariel[/URL][/U] Black.[/I][/B]" - I pointed out that rolling is not involved. You immediately change your story and try to pretend you never said that. Now rolling doesn't need to be involved at all for it to be acceptable. :) Since you insist on arguing in bad faith, I think we are done here. You lose. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification