Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Caliburn101" data-source="post: 7258218" data-attributes="member: 6802178"><p>I suggest you review the entire thread and understand what I clearly said at the start and made clear during, that I have been making my point entirely upon the unfairness of the RESULTS of the dice, not the action of rolling them.</p><p></p><p>If you want to argue that the results of a poor set of dice rolls and a very good one, consequently impacting every associated roll from then on for good or bad is 'fair', then I suggest you revisit that dictionary you are so keen to refer to and also refer to any number of websites that discuss what a fair game is - that being a game where all players have the same probability of a successful outcome not associated with the <em>choices</em> made during the game. Unfortunately, once the different stat bonuses are baked in, the players do not have the same probability of a successful outcome from the dice - there will always be someone rolling with lower bonuses, and always someone with higher ones that have nothing to do with the choices they made in the game (class, feats, stat allocation, circumstantial actions, etc.).</p><p></p><p>Rolling the same number of dice is fair - the results rarely are, and only then by an extreme coincidence of chance. It is not fair that the <em><strong>permanent</strong></em> disadvantage or advantage they produce be suffered or enjoyed by players who are each wanting to have their characters survive and succeed in actions they take.</p><p></p><p>To be clear - you have misunderstood the point of this discussion and you can review that mistake at your leisure (the thread is all here). You can post whatever you like afterwards, I will not be here to read it, as I would probably be tempted to cynically think you are being deliberate in your miscomprehension, and deploying a strawman argument... but that would be, dare I say it, <em>unfair</em>?</p><p></p><p>Your other point is, frankly, a crass guess.</p><p></p><p>'Undoubtedly fewer' people who think stat allocation is unfair? You are hilarious - you have never known one, and neither have I, and you should admit to that. If you had encountered even one, you would have claimed that already...</p><p></p><p>I've been playing D&D for 39 years and never, ever encountered anyone who claimed point allocation (in any rpg system) was unfair. Your statement is baseless, and you know it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Caliburn101, post: 7258218, member: 6802178"] I suggest you review the entire thread and understand what I clearly said at the start and made clear during, that I have been making my point entirely upon the unfairness of the RESULTS of the dice, not the action of rolling them. If you want to argue that the results of a poor set of dice rolls and a very good one, consequently impacting every associated roll from then on for good or bad is 'fair', then I suggest you revisit that dictionary you are so keen to refer to and also refer to any number of websites that discuss what a fair game is - that being a game where all players have the same probability of a successful outcome not associated with the [I]choices[/I] made during the game. Unfortunately, once the different stat bonuses are baked in, the players do not have the same probability of a successful outcome from the dice - there will always be someone rolling with lower bonuses, and always someone with higher ones that have nothing to do with the choices they made in the game (class, feats, stat allocation, circumstantial actions, etc.). Rolling the same number of dice is fair - the results rarely are, and only then by an extreme coincidence of chance. It is not fair that the [I][B]permanent[/B][/I] disadvantage or advantage they produce be suffered or enjoyed by players who are each wanting to have their characters survive and succeed in actions they take. To be clear - you have misunderstood the point of this discussion and you can review that mistake at your leisure (the thread is all here). You can post whatever you like afterwards, I will not be here to read it, as I would probably be tempted to cynically think you are being deliberate in your miscomprehension, and deploying a strawman argument... but that would be, dare I say it, [I]unfair[/I]? Your other point is, frankly, a crass guess. 'Undoubtedly fewer' people who think stat allocation is unfair? You are hilarious - you have never known one, and neither have I, and you should admit to that. If you had encountered even one, you would have claimed that already... I've been playing D&D for 39 years and never, ever encountered anyone who claimed point allocation (in any rpg system) was unfair. Your statement is baseless, and you know it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top