Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 7262509" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>This failed argument again?!?!? Don't you ever get tired of the, "Well, since you accept X unrealistic thing, it's nonsense to want Y to be more realistic." argument? Realism isn't something that needs every last thing in the game to become more realistic in order to justify wanting some aspect of the game to be more realistic. </p><p></p><p>There are tons of different parts of the the game, and each of them is independent when it comes to realism. I can want stats to be more realistic, without necessarily wanting backgrounds, combat and weapons to be more realistic. Or I could want backgrounds and weapons to be more realistic, without caring if stats or armor is more realistic. </p><p></p><p>It all boils down to enjoyability. Not many people want to play a game that mirrors real life, but lots of us do want to play a game that is more realistic than the level of realism that D&D is produced at. So we shift portions of the game towards the more realistic end of the spectrum and increase the fun factor, without pushing those things too far and making them unfun. other aspects we are okay with at the level of realism they already sit at and it would either make those aspects less fun to shift them, or is just unnecessary to change and don't bother. </p><p></p><p>Being dismissive of our arguments based on the continued failed argument put forth above just makes you look bad. Agree or disagree with what we are saying, but don't just dismiss what we are saying just because we don't change or are okay with some other aspect of the game.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and I don't even understand how choosing class made it into your example above. We choose our professions in real life, so choosing class is already realistic.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is true that rolling is more realistic than point buys or arrays.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's only power gaming if you are doing it to power game AND you are guaranteed better stats than point buy or array, which you aren't.</p><p></p><p>First, you will almost never be good at everything when you roll, so that implication of yours is incorrect. Second, a charismatic barbarian who is charismatic without giving up combat power is far from good at everything, so that implication is also incorrect. Third, rolling well doesn't make you a good player, so you are wrong on that one as well. 0 for 3 in a single paragraph talking about my side of things. Not good. It means you should go back and re-read a lot of posts, because you've seriously failed to understand what we are saying.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 7262509, member: 23751"] This failed argument again?!?!? Don't you ever get tired of the, "Well, since you accept X unrealistic thing, it's nonsense to want Y to be more realistic." argument? Realism isn't something that needs every last thing in the game to become more realistic in order to justify wanting some aspect of the game to be more realistic. There are tons of different parts of the the game, and each of them is independent when it comes to realism. I can want stats to be more realistic, without necessarily wanting backgrounds, combat and weapons to be more realistic. Or I could want backgrounds and weapons to be more realistic, without caring if stats or armor is more realistic. It all boils down to enjoyability. Not many people want to play a game that mirrors real life, but lots of us do want to play a game that is more realistic than the level of realism that D&D is produced at. So we shift portions of the game towards the more realistic end of the spectrum and increase the fun factor, without pushing those things too far and making them unfun. other aspects we are okay with at the level of realism they already sit at and it would either make those aspects less fun to shift them, or is just unnecessary to change and don't bother. Being dismissive of our arguments based on the continued failed argument put forth above just makes you look bad. Agree or disagree with what we are saying, but don't just dismiss what we are saying just because we don't change or are okay with some other aspect of the game. Oh, and I don't even understand how choosing class made it into your example above. We choose our professions in real life, so choosing class is already realistic. It is true that rolling is more realistic than point buys or arrays. It's only power gaming if you are doing it to power game AND you are guaranteed better stats than point buy or array, which you aren't. First, you will almost never be good at everything when you roll, so that implication of yours is incorrect. Second, a charismatic barbarian who is charismatic without giving up combat power is far from good at everything, so that implication is also incorrect. Third, rolling well doesn't make you a good player, so you are wrong on that one as well. 0 for 3 in a single paragraph talking about my side of things. Not good. It means you should go back and re-read a lot of posts, because you've seriously failed to understand what we are saying. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top