Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7264153" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>One the one hand, I agree with you that our PCs should be more than a set of numbers. This is the appeal of RPGs after all.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, this thread is not about the definition of 'character' in RPGs, or whether numbers are less/more important than characterisation. This thread is about "Point-Buy Versus Rolling For Stats" (there's a clue in the title), so it seems strange to favour one stat generating method over the other on the grounds that 'stats do not really matter'.</p><p></p><p>This thread is all about comparing stat generating methods, therefore for the purposes of this thread then the stats <em>do</em> matter.</p><p></p><p>The general population has stats ranging from 3 to 18. Even in 5e, according to the 5e DMG. Since conceptually our PCs come from that population, all of those numbers are possible scores for our PCs.</p><p></p><p>Point-buy disallows scores of less than 8. It also follows that out of the entire population those with any stat of 7 or less are not 'allowed' to be adventurers. When <em>their</em> village gets destroyed by orcs, they are not <em>allowed</em> to turn their ploughshares into swords and be thrust into a life of adventure.</p><p></p><p>Why? Well...it can be argued (although not convincingly) that low stats are fatal flaws and that such people would not survive and not even try. Despite forty years of rolled PCs with a low stat saying otherwise.</p><p></p><p>But point-buy also forbids stats above 15 (we are talking about the pre-racial adjustment scores here). Why? When the orcs destroyed the village, Thicko (Int 5), Jack (all stats 8-15) and Tiny (Str/Con 18) are the only survivors. They each salvage weapons and are determined to avenge their people and be swept up in a life of adventure. As they set out, a mysterious figure appears and holds up its hand. "Sorry Thicko, you are too stupid to be an adventurer. Jack, no problem. Tiny, I'm sorry but you are just too strong and tough to be an adventurer!"</p><p></p><p>WTF? What do you mean, 'too strong to be an adventurer?' That makes no sense at all!</p><p></p><p>"Of course it makes sense. If Tiny goes after the orcs alongside Jack, then Jack will feel like he's not contributing."</p><p></p><p>Again, WTF? Actually, Jack says that if the disparity means they cannot adventure together then Jack will bow out because Tiny will get the Job done better than him.</p><p></p><p>"No, no, it can't be Tiny, he's just too....good!"</p><p></p><p>That's...good. We want our best guy on the case!</p><p></p><p>"No, it wouldn't be fair on the orcs"</p><p></p><p>*tumbleweed* *Thicko picks nose*</p><p></p><p>We all lost loved ones, and we are all going after the orcs.</p><p></p><p>"But Thicko will die because he's too stupid to live! No offence."</p><p></p><p>None taken, dude. I <em>am</em> particularly stupid. In fact, in a statistically average room of 216 people only three people will be more stupid than me.</p><p></p><p>"And Tiny will kill the orcs too quickly, and Jack will feel bad."</p><p></p><p>...No...I'll be totally okay with that.</p><p></p><p>*mysterious stranger disappears in a puff of logic*</p><p></p><p>*Thicko puts something in his mouth-don't ask!*</p><p></p><p>Who was the dude in the dress?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7264153, member: 6799649"] One the one hand, I agree with you that our PCs should be more than a set of numbers. This is the appeal of RPGs after all. On the other hand, this thread is not about the definition of 'character' in RPGs, or whether numbers are less/more important than characterisation. This thread is about "Point-Buy Versus Rolling For Stats" (there's a clue in the title), so it seems strange to favour one stat generating method over the other on the grounds that 'stats do not really matter'. This thread is all about comparing stat generating methods, therefore for the purposes of this thread then the stats [i]do[/i] matter. The general population has stats ranging from 3 to 18. Even in 5e, according to the 5e DMG. Since conceptually our PCs come from that population, all of those numbers are possible scores for our PCs. Point-buy disallows scores of less than 8. It also follows that out of the entire population those with any stat of 7 or less are not 'allowed' to be adventurers. When [i]their[/i] village gets destroyed by orcs, they are not [i]allowed[/i] to turn their ploughshares into swords and be thrust into a life of adventure. Why? Well...it can be argued (although not convincingly) that low stats are fatal flaws and that such people would not survive and not even try. Despite forty years of rolled PCs with a low stat saying otherwise. But point-buy also forbids stats above 15 (we are talking about the pre-racial adjustment scores here). Why? When the orcs destroyed the village, Thicko (Int 5), Jack (all stats 8-15) and Tiny (Str/Con 18) are the only survivors. They each salvage weapons and are determined to avenge their people and be swept up in a life of adventure. As they set out, a mysterious figure appears and holds up its hand. "Sorry Thicko, you are too stupid to be an adventurer. Jack, no problem. Tiny, I'm sorry but you are just too strong and tough to be an adventurer!" WTF? What do you mean, 'too strong to be an adventurer?' That makes no sense at all! "Of course it makes sense. If Tiny goes after the orcs alongside Jack, then Jack will feel like he's not contributing." Again, WTF? Actually, Jack says that if the disparity means they cannot adventure together then Jack will bow out because Tiny will get the Job done better than him. "No, no, it can't be Tiny, he's just too....good!" That's...good. We want our best guy on the case! "No, it wouldn't be fair on the orcs" *tumbleweed* *Thicko picks nose* We all lost loved ones, and we are all going after the orcs. "But Thicko will die because he's too stupid to live! No offence." None taken, dude. I [i]am[/i] particularly stupid. In fact, in a statistically average room of 216 people only three people will be more stupid than me. "And Tiny will kill the orcs too quickly, and Jack will feel bad." ...No...I'll be totally okay with that. *mysterious stranger disappears in a puff of logic* *Thicko puts something in his mouth-don't ask!* Who was the dude in the dress? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top