Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 7274939" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>Those three 15's are offset by the three 8's you're forced to take along with them, making all choices available through point-buy theoretically equivalent. You may disagree, but I think that's the intent behind the system, not that everyone is going to pick the one, most optimal option. Also, it's only 100% if you choose them, a choice which is available to anyone else who's also using point-buy, remembering there are 64 other arrays available.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We've also been talking about player decision-making vs. randomness, but you don't seem inclined to address either of my arguments, so I'll move on.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course there is! There are many other methods for rolling ability scores (some of them have been talked about in this thread), and there is no constraint placed on the DM to use any one of them, or prohibition against devising new ones. 5e is a game which gives the DM full latitude. This should be assumed and kept in mind in specific cases when it isn't stated directly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Citation?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm sorry you're so dissatisfied with the current edition. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, then you've failed to understand the context of what it is you've posted.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've made no such claim. I think it's clear, though, that adventurers are not commoners, and commoners are not adventurers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I'm not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You asked me to cite "rules" to support my claim that step 3, along with the other steps in Chapter 1, is specifically intended for the creation of adventurers. I've done that. You, on the other hand, are unable to provide a shred of textual evidence that supports the claim that any NPC that has rolled ability scores is meant to have its scores rolled by the method given in step 3.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm using <em>campaign</em> the same way the PHB uses the word, i.e. "an ongoing story". A campaign can span generations of PC groups and multiple settings. Or you could have multiple campaigns that take place in the same setting. Anyway, I haven't misused the word, and I know what I mean by it.</p><p></p><p>My point is that point-buy has no bearing on the distribution of scores in any characters other than those who are created using it. And of course some PCs could be created using point-buy and some using dice-rolling. Why not?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 7274939, member: 6787503"] Those three 15's are offset by the three 8's you're forced to take along with them, making all choices available through point-buy theoretically equivalent. You may disagree, but I think that's the intent behind the system, not that everyone is going to pick the one, most optimal option. Also, it's only 100% if you choose them, a choice which is available to anyone else who's also using point-buy, remembering there are 64 other arrays available. We've also been talking about player decision-making vs. randomness, but you don't seem inclined to address either of my arguments, so I'll move on. Of course there is! There are many other methods for rolling ability scores (some of them have been talked about in this thread), and there is no constraint placed on the DM to use any one of them, or prohibition against devising new ones. 5e is a game which gives the DM full latitude. This should be assumed and kept in mind in specific cases when it isn't stated directly. Citation? I'm sorry you're so dissatisfied with the current edition. :) Well, then you've failed to understand the context of what it is you've posted. I've made no such claim. I think it's clear, though, that adventurers are not commoners, and commoners are not adventurers. No, I'm not. You asked me to cite "rules" to support my claim that step 3, along with the other steps in Chapter 1, is specifically intended for the creation of adventurers. I've done that. You, on the other hand, are unable to provide a shred of textual evidence that supports the claim that any NPC that has rolled ability scores is meant to have its scores rolled by the method given in step 3. I'm using [I]campaign[/I] the same way the PHB uses the word, i.e. "an ongoing story". A campaign can span generations of PC groups and multiple settings. Or you could have multiple campaigns that take place in the same setting. Anyway, I haven't misused the word, and I know what I mean by it. My point is that point-buy has no bearing on the distribution of scores in any characters other than those who are created using it. And of course some PCs could be created using point-buy and some using dice-rolling. Why not? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Point Buy vs Rolling for Stats
Top