Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Point of Origin?? (for spells)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="radmod" data-source="post: 5362557" data-attributes="member: 93008"><p>There's no need to call it a house rule because it isn't. It is RAW.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>From your post (and the RC):</p><p></p><p></p><p>'function' means to work or operate. You can legally cast a spell within an anti-magic field yet the casting does not work since the activation of the spell is a function of the spell itself. Think of it this way, a car has the function of transportation. Yet, it also has a function of starting. If I cast an anti-ignition field on your car, the function of the car's starting would be suppressed. If you pushed the car out of my field, it would not automatically start because the instantaneous function of it starting was suppressed and no longer exists. You could, of course, restart it (e.g. recast).</p><p></p><p>However, let us presume that you can cast within the field. However, none of the functions of the spell work. Since none of the functions work, you cannot have a point of origin since it is a function of the spell. Duration, however, is specifically exempted.</p><p></p><p>Finally, from the glossary entry for <a href="http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/glossary&term=Glossary_dnd_pointoforigin&alpha=P" target="_blank">point of origin</a></p><p></p><p>This does not ignore the fact that a spell can have two points of origin: where the spell begins and where the caster wishes the magical effect to begin. Since a spell always begins where a caster casts it, then the initial point of origin of the spell is "entirely suppressed."</p><p></p><p>The problem with the WOTC article is, well, the WOTC articles. They are old and contradictory and, from my experience, often just plain wrong. Note, for example, it says an AMF blocks LOE, but the RC says otherwise. I sometimes think they cause more harm than good and should either be deleted or labeled with a big "May no longer be applicable" sign.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="radmod, post: 5362557, member: 93008"] There's no need to call it a house rule because it isn't. It is RAW. From your post (and the RC): 'function' means to work or operate. You can legally cast a spell within an anti-magic field yet the casting does not work since the activation of the spell is a function of the spell itself. Think of it this way, a car has the function of transportation. Yet, it also has a function of starting. If I cast an anti-ignition field on your car, the function of the car's starting would be suppressed. If you pushed the car out of my field, it would not automatically start because the instantaneous function of it starting was suppressed and no longer exists. You could, of course, restart it (e.g. recast). However, let us presume that you can cast within the field. However, none of the functions of the spell work. Since none of the functions work, you cannot have a point of origin since it is a function of the spell. Duration, however, is specifically exempted. Finally, from the glossary entry for [URL="http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/glossary&term=Glossary_dnd_pointoforigin&alpha=P"]point of origin[/URL] This does not ignore the fact that a spell can have two points of origin: where the spell begins and where the caster wishes the magical effect to begin. Since a spell always begins where a caster casts it, then the initial point of origin of the spell is "entirely suppressed." The problem with the WOTC article is, well, the WOTC articles. They are old and contradictory and, from my experience, often just plain wrong. Note, for example, it says an AMF blocks LOE, but the RC says otherwise. I sometimes think they cause more harm than good and should either be deleted or labeled with a big "May no longer be applicable" sign. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Point of Origin?? (for spells)
Top