Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Poison evil?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 243481" data-attributes="member: 2486"><p>Celebrim, I apologise if I misunderstood your position. Many of my assumptions (that of buying a sword not arousing suspicions etc.) were based on the standard DnD model.</p><p></p><p>If, in your campaign, weapons are difficult to purchase, arouse suspicions and the like, then good for you. I was arguing assuming the standard DnD parameters. However, you still hold to the notion that lethal poisons cause MORE suspicion. Your justifications for this is flawed.</p><p></p><p>'It is conceable'</p><p></p><p>As is a Finger of Death scroll.</p><p></p><p>'It is difficult to defend against'</p><p></p><p>As is a Finger of Death scroll.</p><p></p><p>'saves don't scale as quickly as HPs'</p><p></p><p>Same with a Finger of Death scroll.</p><p></p><p>You then proceed to quote a long passage from Romeo and Juliet. Unfortunately, whilst this adds colour to your argument, it adds no more conviction. Romeo and Juliet is set is Renaissance Italy, not DnD. There is no magic in R&J, there is in DnD. Indeed, you cite only one example (read anecdote) wherein poison is more difficult to come by, in a world with not only perhaps different social assumptions but even different parameters (magic vs. no magic). This anecdote is interesting but irrelevant.</p><p></p><p>With regard to the rules, you move the goalposts. How can we possibly argue a thread if you define the parameters. I had assumed (in the Dnd rules forum) that the parameters were defined as the standard DnD ones. If you use a different ruling, that's your choice- but please share it with us so our arguments can be coherent. </p><p></p><p>'Rendering a person helpless is not necessarily proof of good and honourable motives'.</p><p></p><p>But neither is it proof of evil or dishonourable motives. Each scenario must be taken in context, without empirical statements being made.</p><p></p><p>With regard to death magics, you have illustrated my point. The original question was 'Is poison evil?' Against that I juxtaposed the question 'Is death magic evil?' Your answer to the latter was 'only if perceived to be', as was your answer to the former. Since death magic is not listed as [Evil], the conclusion is neither is poison. Poison is not [Evil]. QED.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al, post: 243481, member: 2486"] Celebrim, I apologise if I misunderstood your position. Many of my assumptions (that of buying a sword not arousing suspicions etc.) were based on the standard DnD model. If, in your campaign, weapons are difficult to purchase, arouse suspicions and the like, then good for you. I was arguing assuming the standard DnD parameters. However, you still hold to the notion that lethal poisons cause MORE suspicion. Your justifications for this is flawed. 'It is conceable' As is a Finger of Death scroll. 'It is difficult to defend against' As is a Finger of Death scroll. 'saves don't scale as quickly as HPs' Same with a Finger of Death scroll. You then proceed to quote a long passage from Romeo and Juliet. Unfortunately, whilst this adds colour to your argument, it adds no more conviction. Romeo and Juliet is set is Renaissance Italy, not DnD. There is no magic in R&J, there is in DnD. Indeed, you cite only one example (read anecdote) wherein poison is more difficult to come by, in a world with not only perhaps different social assumptions but even different parameters (magic vs. no magic). This anecdote is interesting but irrelevant. With regard to the rules, you move the goalposts. How can we possibly argue a thread if you define the parameters. I had assumed (in the Dnd rules forum) that the parameters were defined as the standard DnD ones. If you use a different ruling, that's your choice- but please share it with us so our arguments can be coherent. 'Rendering a person helpless is not necessarily proof of good and honourable motives'. But neither is it proof of evil or dishonourable motives. Each scenario must be taken in context, without empirical statements being made. With regard to death magics, you have illustrated my point. The original question was 'Is poison evil?' Against that I juxtaposed the question 'Is death magic evil?' Your answer to the latter was 'only if perceived to be', as was your answer to the former. Since death magic is not listed as [Evil], the conclusion is neither is poison. Poison is not [Evil]. QED. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Poison evil?
Top