Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 2593760" data-attributes="member: 1288">Here's a little secret; don't tell Erik I told you this. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />The lucerne hammer didn't have reach in my original draft. In my draft, the lucerne hammer and the bec-de-corbin were largely identical, except the bec had reach and the lucerne hammer did not. Based on my viewing of historical examples of both weapons, that seemed to make the most sense as a means of handling them.Paizo saw fit to alter that in editing. I can't speak to why, and I'm not going to claim that my way is "better" or "worse" than the final product. Just pointing out what I'd had in mind with those weapons.</blockquote>