Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7305403" data-attributes="member: 6919838">I do *not* want all classes equally skilled at each pillar. I do *not* want any one class to be the only one best at any one pillar.If there were 13 classes and 3 pillars i would be thrilled to see two classes as best for each of the 3 pillars (six classes), two classes as second best for each &quot;pair&quot; of pillars (six classes). One class third best at each pillar and all the other pillars being fourth best for the classes.This makes every class a trade off.However, imo, this can be served well by the class sub-class system if each class has sub-classes for each pillar. In that case, matching a class good at a pillar and a sub-class good at a pillar aims for best while choosing to divide the focus gets you broader second best. Sent from my [device_name] using <a href="http://EN World mobile app" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7305403, member: 6919838"] I do *not* want all classes equally skilled at each pillar. I do *not* want any one class to be the only one best at any one pillar. If there were 13 classes and 3 pillars i would be thrilled to see two classes as best for each of the 3 pillars (six classes), two classes as second best for each "pair" of pillars (six classes). One class third best at each pillar and all the other pillars being fourth best for the classes. This makes every class a trade off. However, imo, this can be served well by the class sub-class system if each class has sub-classes for each pillar. In that case, matching a class good at a pillar and a sub-class good at a pillar aims for best while choosing to divide the focus gets you broader second best. Sent from my [device_name] using [url]EN World mobile app[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification