Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3609162" data-attributes="member: 2067">The DM is allowed to change anything his players will let him get away with, pretty much. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />As a player, I'm pretty demanding. You've gotta have *good* reasons for ruling as you do, and if I disagree with those reasons, I might still play, but I can't say I'll be entirely comfortable. I'll go with &quot;I'm trying to do a low magic game, so no spellcasters and human-only PC's.&quot;I won't go with &quot;The standard game is too monty haul and is made for munchkin powergamers and it sucks so I made it better.&quot;One speaks to the experience I'll have playing it.The other speaks to the DM's arrogance and ignorance. Neither of which is an experience I'm amenable to having very often for very long.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3609162, member: 2067"] The DM is allowed to change anything his players will let him get away with, pretty much. :) As a player, I'm pretty demanding. You've gotta have *good* reasons for ruling as you do, and if I disagree with those reasons, I might still play, but I can't say I'll be entirely comfortable. I'll go with "I'm trying to do a low magic game, so no spellcasters and human-only PC's." I won't go with "The standard game is too monty haul and is made for munchkin powergamers and it sucks so I made it better." One speaks to the experience I'll have playing it. The other speaks to the DM's arrogance and ignorance. Neither of which is an experience I'm amenable to having very often for very long. [/QUOTE]

Verification