Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gladius Legis" data-source="post: 7195489" data-attributes="member: 68748">I'll get my opinion on the PHB Ranger out of the way: It's a dumpster fire, and I'm glad WOTC is revising it.My vote will be for the latest UA Ranger, which is "mostly satisfied." It's headed many steps in the right direction, although it still needs some tweaks here and there before it's really ready for prime time. Though I'd certainly play the UA Ranger as is.As for specific things the UA Ranger still needs, off the top of my head:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Hunter and Beast Conclaves still need the bonus spells all other newer archetypes have received since.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I'd still like the see the base class have an Expertise feature of some kind.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Coordinated Attack needs an option to let the Ranger make a second attack instead of the beast if the situation calls for it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Greater Favored Enemy's advantage on saves needs to apply to your original Favored Enemy, as well.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">While the capstone has been made reasonably effective from a combat standpoint, I'd still prefer to see it re-imagined or redone altogether, as it still introduces WIS as a suddenly important combat attribute at Lv. 20 in the most awkward way.</li> </ul></blockquote>