Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Poll] Rogue Satisfaction Survey
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 7196754" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>I used to love rogues for their flexibility. In 5e I don't.</p><p></p><p>1. They're too DEX-focused. Most classes can produce competent builds without at least a 14 in the presumptive main stat. In my experience, Barbarians and Rogues are the classes that fail this test -- there should be diversity in builds, but there aren't. Charisma Rouges, Intelligence Rogues, Strength Rogues should exist much more than they do. (I've just started playing a Wisdom Rogue, but even still, a Dex 14 seems "needed").</p><p></p><p>2. They don't have a niche. As described above, Rogues are often though of as skill-monkeys or the high-damage striker. Neither of these holds true: Bards quickly outclass rogues as skill monkeys (and are supplemented by a full swathe of utility and healing spells); and the viability of sneak-attack damage is not obvious.</p><p></p><p>(I've seen many fighter-archers; few rogue-archers. A well-designed class should present a real choice for archer builds, with two different but equally viable possibilities. I feel that isn't there.)</p><p></p><p>3. Mundanity. I feel the hurt particularly since so few options for non-spellcasting classes exist. Fighter I feel is robust and diverse. I wish I felt the same for the Rogue. </p><p></p><p>One thing rogues do do, that I wish was exploited more is this:</p><p></p><p>4. Intersection with Backgrounds. I find this particularly robust, with the possibility of Acolyte Rogues, Sage Rogues, Craftsmen Rogues, Soldier Rogues. Each of these should be amazing. But I don't see the possibility of cool combinations being made often enough.</p><p></p><p>(Back during the 5e playtest, in the beforetimes, when they first introduced backgrounds, I wanted Rogues to have two backgrounds (and get their extra skills that way). I still think that would have been awesome -- rogues by their nature would be noble/thugs, or acolyte/soldiers, or charlatan/craftsmen, or whatever.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 7196754, member: 23484"] I used to love rogues for their flexibility. In 5e I don't. 1. They're too DEX-focused. Most classes can produce competent builds without at least a 14 in the presumptive main stat. In my experience, Barbarians and Rogues are the classes that fail this test -- there should be diversity in builds, but there aren't. Charisma Rouges, Intelligence Rogues, Strength Rogues should exist much more than they do. (I've just started playing a Wisdom Rogue, but even still, a Dex 14 seems "needed"). 2. They don't have a niche. As described above, Rogues are often though of as skill-monkeys or the high-damage striker. Neither of these holds true: Bards quickly outclass rogues as skill monkeys (and are supplemented by a full swathe of utility and healing spells); and the viability of sneak-attack damage is not obvious. (I've seen many fighter-archers; few rogue-archers. A well-designed class should present a real choice for archer builds, with two different but equally viable possibilities. I feel that isn't there.) 3. Mundanity. I feel the hurt particularly since so few options for non-spellcasting classes exist. Fighter I feel is robust and diverse. I wish I felt the same for the Rogue. One thing rogues do do, that I wish was exploited more is this: 4. Intersection with Backgrounds. I find this particularly robust, with the possibility of Acolyte Rogues, Sage Rogues, Craftsmen Rogues, Soldier Rogues. Each of these should be amazing. But I don't see the possibility of cool combinations being made often enough. (Back during the 5e playtest, in the beforetimes, when they first introduced backgrounds, I wanted Rogues to have two backgrounds (and get their extra skills that way). I still think that would have been awesome -- rogues by their nature would be noble/thugs, or acolyte/soldiers, or charlatan/craftsmen, or whatever.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Poll] Rogue Satisfaction Survey
Top