Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Theuderic" data-source="post: 394210" data-attributes="member: 7802"><p>I agree with you Gizzard. The restrictions should be kept in place. It would not make a good default. If a DM wants to do this sort of thing what is stopping him? Surely you don't need an offical statement from WOTC in the rule books saying so. I for one am thinking about running a 3rd E campaign set in Greyhawk. Now I know a lot of people will think this is crazy, but I'm going to use the same class/race restrictions as in First Edition AD&D. The reason why is because this is the style of the campaign I wish to run. I don't think I will have many objections if any at all. I believe most people are willing to accept these things that the DM puts forth. If not then play in another campaign. So there are 2 restrictions that you don't agree with. Big deal. You know what you can do as DM. Do it. YOU are the final arbiter of the game! You have absolute power! What you don't like change. What you do like keep. DONT be a slave to the rulebook! Remember DMs SHOULD tweek the game to make their games more personalized. If you don't like the restrictions it's easy: get rid of them on your own.</p></blockquote><p></p>